Ice_Ice_Brady
where black is the color where none is the number
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,977
- Reaction score
- 53,350
Hindsight is glorious.
I wanted them to keep Brady for reasons other than any chance at a SB, but the idea that he would keep playing at such a high level for several more years surprised most people. And NO WAY the Pats could have put as good a team as Tampa was around him. They had gobs of blue-collar draft picks, two of the best WRs in the league, two good TEs and enough money (considering that they were willing to mortgage their future as they did) to bring in several more pieces.
Had the Patriots tried to do that, they almost certainly wouldn't have gotten a Superbowl anyway -too many holes to fill - and where would they be now?
Then why sign veteran, aging players? It isn’t hindsight as most of us were adamant at the time about it. It’s basic risk reward stuff. If you extend him and he’s still great, you have football’s most valuable player for a few more years. If he isn’t, well, it’s not like you had Trevor Lawrence or Andrew Luck in your hands.












