- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I missed anyone saying you can't.I gotta say I think its just plain ridiculous to tell people they can't discuss a former player who was part of the unbeaten regular season and is a certain hall of famer.
This stinks of homerism. If all you want on here is koolaid chuggers please put a sign up on the way in so we get that. This is the sort of thing that will turn people off the site. Its been the best Patriots messageboard for quite a while now but this thing and the SMY thing are not good.
I dont agree.
To say that you can watch a game on TV and determine what the coverages are consistently is lying.
Teams play a significantly higher amount of zone against us than man, so how can Welker be facing the no 1 corner as a rule?
Look, if we dont fumble the KO and if Gronk doesnt fumble inside the 5, we may well have taken a 21-20 lead in the 4th quarter.
The problem with the offense last week was turnovers. Without them we may be sitting here at 7-1. Instead people need to convince themselves the walls are caving in.
I dont agree.
To say that you can watch a game on TV and determine what the coverages are consistently is lying.
Teams play a significantly higher amount of zone against us than man, so how can Welker be facing the no 1 corner as a rule?
Look, if we dont fumble the KO and if Gronk doesnt fumble inside the 5, we may well have taken a 21-20 lead in the 4th quarter.
The problem with the offense last week was turnovers. Without them we may be sitting here at 7-1. Instead people need to convince themselves the walls are caving in.
Fine to think and but before you ink, please read Ian's request on having all Moss thoughts/threads/comments under a single thread that he created.
There just reaches a point where players skills diminish. The ones that thrive as they get older find other ways to get the job done. Moss has not yet.Since last year's Colts game, which was almost exactly one year ago in Week 10, here are Moss' statistics.
Regular season- 16 games
48 catches
712 yards
11 touchdowns
100-yard games- ZERO
2010 longest play from scrimmage- 37 yards
I'm starting to think this was less about attitude and more about talent. The TDs are still good, but even these are starting to become rare.
Pats 3-1 with Randy and 6-1 post Moss. Moss has been on a tear of losing games post Patriots. I can only imagine his tragic mental state sorta like Archangel Lucifer after being thrown out of heaven because of his hubris. Heh.
They had to stick a camera on him during the Titans loss yesterday. Just sitting on the bench, alone and staring. It's too bad.
It will be interesting to see what asterisk gets applied to the Patriots' 39-26 wipeout against the Steelers. I only say that because it seems that every one of their big wins recently has come with one. You know: Brad Childress blew it. Or the Chargers put the ball on the ground. Or the Ravens aren't as good as everyone thought.
Obviously, most of those asterisks were handed out by the crowd that simply refuses to believe the Patriots can be a better team without Randy Moss. I'm sure these folks will be coming up with something after Sunday night. (Roethlisberger sucks? Steelers injuries? Fluke performance?)
For the rest of us, the facts are becoming abundantly clear. The Patriots are no frauds. Pick apart their 7-2 record as much as you like, but Sunday showed us what they are capable of. It turns out last Sunday's debacle in Cleveland was an aberration, not a harbinger. It turns out they can play defense. It turns out there's more than enough room on a football field for Tom Brady to throw the ball without Moss performing that overhyped, overrated and grotesquely cliched task: stretching a defense.
Beyond all that, Sunday showed us that the Patriots have the character and resilience that championship-caliber teams must have. It turns out they can respond to adversity. It turns out they can take coaching and handle a star quarterback getting in their face (how do you think Moss would have responded to Brady's second-quarter rant?).
Certainly, there will be some weeks ahead when the Pats struggle. They aren't running the table. The doubters will have some material to work with, no question about it. Who knows, maybe the Pats hit the skids again this Sunday against nemesis Peyton Manning.
But here's what I took from Sunday: When the bleep hits the fan, unlike last year's fragile, pouty bunch (captained by Moss), this year's squad won't use it as an excuse to get worse.
In the end this Patriots team might not be talented enough. But they'll be in it all the way. And when the season is over, win or lose, at least we'll recognize them.
Oh sorry... missed that one. If a mod could move this, I would appreciate it.
But he's drawing double coverages
Although I was never a fan of the 2007 style offense I liked Randy.
Yeah, be sure and do that. The people who said this offense couldn't be any good without Randy tend to be a little sensitive about the issue. Especially after last night.