Texans Potentially a Trade Partner with Patriots For Boutte?

[Wozzy]

I believe it has been discussed thoroughly that Brown, Doubs and Boutte can all play X, Y and Z

Borregales can line up in the slot or outside… that doesn’t make it smart.

None of these guys is who you want in the slot.

 

[Family]

the issue with some of that could be that Pop, Boutte, Brown, Doubs do not play ST
Williams is a fairly good return man on kick offs. Chism not so much on kick offs

You can sit Chism and bring up any practice squad backup you wish to fill in special teams.

 

[FCB02062]

I swear, some people on here want to make trades just for the sake of making a trade. Nothin less than a second IF he's traded (no way ami in favor of trading Boutte). You don't trade away one of your QBs favorite outside receivers so you can get a 5th round pick.. ****ing morons

 

[Hyped]

I don't want to trade Boutte for anything less than a 3rd rounder.

Why trade a perfectly good WR...arguably our best WR the last 2 seasons for a late round pick? Injuries do happen. I still see Boutte seeing enough snaps even with AJ and Doubs being #1/#2 right now.

 

[Pape]

we will see how serious the texans interest is

if he plays tonight, its hot air
if he doesn't, then maybe there is a real fire causing all this smoke on the rumor mill

 

[Thelonious]

The more I see of him, the more I want to keep him. I'd be happy to see the matter dropped, even if that means keeping 7 WR's. I expect AJB to be a one-year player. I hope and suspect he'll be a valuable addition this year, but that will be another year of wear and tear on a player already showing signs of decline and likely to ask for a boatload of cash next year, more than I think the Pats can responsibly pay given his age and the need to sign other, younger players, Drake included.

 

[Water Boy]

I have no intention of getting into a pissing contest about this and I respect most people's opinions, but I have yet to hear a compelling argument that having the redundancy that Booty brings makes us a better team than having a WR corp with a diversified skill set.

JMcD is a matchup game plan coordinator. Booty is a contested catch X who is good at the catch point and that's about it. So are AJB and Doubs and Hollins obviously has that element too.

As training camp is showing us, AJB and Doubs are building chemistry with Maye and will be the featured WR in this offense.

Hollins blocking is a key attribute to our run game and he plays special teams.

Pop is our best quick man beating WR who can get separation.

KW has explosive play potential and a speed element and reportedly has the best release package outside of AJB. Yes he's a work in progress but he's under a cheap contract for 3 more seasons.

We have a log jam and other teams know this and Booty is on the last year of deal. A 5 or conditional 4th is all we'll likely get, unfortunately.

 

[Uptown]

Maybe not directly related to Boutte, but allegedly Houston is willing to offload one of their edge rushers.

 

[Zuma]

Maybe not directly related to Boutte, but allegedly Houston is willing to offload one of their edge rushers.

I could be wrong but I don’t think those 3 are even average

 

[Uptown]

Allegedly..

F the Bills…but other teams, let us see those day 2 draft picks, edge rushers, off ball LBs & OL..

 

[DaBruinz]

I could be wrong but I don’t think those 3 are even average

I'd agree with you..

 

[DoubleDeluxe]

I have no intention of getting into a pissing contest about this and I respect most people's opinions, but I have yet to hear a compelling argument that having the redundancy that Booty brings makes us a better team than having a WR corp with a diversified skill set.

JMcD is a matchup game plan coordinator. Booty is a contested catch X who is good at the catch point and that's about it. So are AJB and Doubs and Hollins obviously has that element too.

As training camp is showing us, AJB and Doubs are building chemistry with Maye and will be the featured WR in this offense.

Hollins blocking is a key attribute to our run game and he plays special teams.

Pop is our best quick man beating WR who can get separation.

KW has explosive play potential and a speed element and reportedly has the best release package outside of AJB. Yes he's a work in progress but he's under a cheap contract for 3 more seasons.

We have a log jam and other teams know this and Booty is on the last year of deal. A 5 or conditional 4th is all we'll likely get, unfortunately.

And I respect those who are keen to trade him, but I’ve yet to see a compelling reason why we should.
We will keep 6, so that means you think having Chism as one of the 6 is better schematically than having Boutte.
I do not.
We disagree, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

 

[Ring 6]

Give Andy credit for being consistent. Hes kept up the Hollins hate train despite all evidence to the contrary.

Except there isn’t evidence to the contrary.

 

[mgteich]

the issue with some of that could be that Pop, Boutte, Brown, Doubs do not play ST
Williams is a fairly good return man on kick offs. Chism not so much on kick offs

STARTING POINT
Brown, Doubs, Hollins, and Williams are on the team and on the active roster every game. As noted, Williams is a returner as well as a 3-5 a game target 4th WR in that group. How often should the 5th WR play? Isn't our starting 3 plus Henry enough? Isn't that the current situation through camp? Even a FIVE-receiver set could include the 4 receivers plus Henry or a RB as the 5th recever.
========
What roles do others play? How many targets a game should we expect from the rest? Check last year.

For example, If Boutte has the same role as Doubs, why would the team sit Doubs to play Boutte if they have decided that Doubs is a better choice.

Is Douglas a good enough backup in the slot or change of pace for him to be the active 5th for a few targets a game? Could the team be hoping that Douglas will an inexpensive, reliable #5 again in 2027?

And yes, whoever is the 5th WR on the roster is insurance against one of the top 3 getting injured. His reps would greatly increase in that situation.
=====
Chism is another situation. The team needs to decide whether he is the #5 on the roster, the #6 on the roster or a PS player.

 

[mgteich]

And I respect those who are keen to trade him, but I’ve yet to see a compelling reason why we should.
We will keep 6, so that means you think having Chism as one of the 6 is better schematically than having Boutte.
I do not.
We disagree, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

The 6th schematically? the 6th is at best an inactive player on Game Day, and insurance in case one of the 5 is injured. In that case the 6th becomes the 5th for few snaps that this role gets.

Chism was the 6th in that role. I believe that there was only one game in which he was the 6th active WR. One game had 4 active receivers. The rest had 5,