- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 48,071
- Reaction score
- 29,560
Your partially right. Non-guaranteed contracts are only paper to the teams and a handful of elite players. Most players don’t have any leverage at the end of their contracts. That is one reason it’s not a good idea to just willy nilly push cap money forward because it gives the player some leverage to have their contract redone to lower their cap number.
Players can hold out of off-season activities. But, the fines are too prohibitive now for a player to be a training camp holdout unless they’re a TJ Watt caliber player. The last thing the average player wants is to be cut after the money has dried up.
Guaranteed money had nothing to do with the Mason trade. The Patriots saw him as being overpaid not underpaid believing the position could be upgraded. That might be debatable to you and me, but it appears as if that’s their assessment.
According to OTC, Mason is still on the Buc’s books with his Patriots’ contract. His maximum leverage would have been to say he wouldn’t report unless he received some guarantees. The trade compensation given is in a way a partial guarantee because the team has skin in the situation and would be hesitant to get nothing for the pick(s) the team gave up.
If Mason or Parker receive any guarantees at this point, it will be the team driving the bus for cap space.
Talk about making things up. You have ZERO support for your claim that the Patriots saw Mason as "overpaid".











