- Joined
- Jul 30, 2015
- Messages
- 3,303
- Reaction score
- 8,646
You’re just being intellectually dishonest now.
1. To refute my point about the redraft you posted links where the premise was to redo a specific year. Which was not my original premise. So yeah if you change the entire context of the argument, you are right. Big win there.
2. No you are a homer if you think the vast majority of GM’s would take Brady over Rodgers right now. We’d probably sign him if he was a free agent and said he wanted to play here.
3. Rodgers had two injuries 5 years apart. Both are injuries that are not tough to come back from. Wentz is a riskier player and got himself injured on a needless play. Wentz was injured in 2015 in college and was injured this year. So he was injured 2 out of the 3 most recent years he played. Whose riskier, the guy who had two injuries 5 years apart in a career that so far has spanned 10 years in the pros as a starter or the guy who was injured his last year of college and second year in the pros? Also let’s go a step further, how many QB’s had incredible rookie or sophomore years only to crash back to Earth? The answer is a lot. This is a league about consistency. Last year you would have argued for Dak
I'm sure there are plenty of GMs that would take Rodgers over Brady for next year, just like there are plenty that would take Brady.
But to point 3, if you account for age and say 'you can have any QB in the league for the rest of his career' I bet that a lot of GMs would think for a long time about taking Wentz over everyone else.