- Joined
- Jan 16, 2005
- Messages
- 14,031
- Reaction score
- 11,405
4 of them, a 3, a 5 and two in round 7...Do the Rams even have any draft picks next year at this point?
Rams left with only 4 draft picks in 2022 after Von Miller trade
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.4 of them, a 3, a 5 and two in round 7...Do the Rams even have any draft picks next year at this point?
Sounds like us in 2017 when we only had 3 picks.4 of them, a 3, a 5 and two in round 7...
Rams left with only 4 draft picks in 2022 after Von Miller trade
The cupboard isn't entirely bare, maybe they will hit on some "infrastructure" pieces, or maybe get really lucky:
It is a fact if teams are constantly picking after the top 15 in the draft they have a very hard time replacing top old, expensive talent with new, top economical talent.I hate it when people say ”they’ll still have 8 picks.” Who cares how many you have if you don’t factor in the value? They have no 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round picks. Any team could trade down a bunch of times and get 10 (!) seventh round picks if they wanted to.
It is a fact if teams are constantly picking after the top 15 in the draft they have a very hard time replacing top old, expensive talent with new, top economical talent.
There is no way the Lambs can sustain this model.
All the need to do is look 3200 miles northeast.
Yeah, but I don't think Tampa pillaged their draft capital at the same time, whereas the Rams clearly did.
Yes, I think both are true, yet (2) can be problematic going forward.
As Andrew says:
It’s a lot, but Sanu set the precedent on that.
Their 2022 cap looks interesting.Sure…you’re right….but the game of musical chairs tends to end for most teams. Most of us thought the Rams were one year all-in 2018, and now it’s three years later and they’re still a contender. And this is a championship contending roster. It’s hard to really knock their strategy considering where they were when it started.
Other thing to consider is the Rams won’t be picking in the top 15 any time soon, whixh may factor into their willingness to trade away a first round pick.
agree IPP, Dallas, Rams, Arizona, Saints, Tampa, Green Bay....all good teams...can't believe we played three of them(could have won two of them too, probably should have)Rams are going for ALL IN
They are facing anyway tough competition..
Nfc looks strong this year too
Ive said from the beginning that Brady will not win the Super Bowl again.
Rams, Cardinals, Packers and Cowboys all have the fire power to take the Buccaneers out.
I do not believe Stafford can win 3 road games to make the super bowl so they need to win that division.
I do not like Brady vs Rodgers again.I don't know about Arizona or GB, but the way to beat the Bucs is good man coverage across the board and a good pass rush. I think the Rams have the best shot at doing it. Cowboys can do it too but their pass rush is not as great.
Broncos trading Von Miller to Rams - ProFootballTalk (nbcsports.com)
For a 2nd and 3rd, Rams going for it! And the Broncos are paying almost all of his remaining salary!
I see your point, but after a certain point it seems the pick position is only loosely associated with player talent.I hate it when people say ”they’ll still have 8 picks.” Who cares how many you have if you don’t factor in the value? They have no 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round picks. Any team could trade down a bunch of times and get 10 (!) seventh round picks if they wanted to.
I see your point, but after a certain point it seems the pick position is only loosely associated with player talent.
The thing that bothers me more is people say "First round pick" without differentiating between #1 and #31.
For instance, one factor the Rams are probably keeping in mind as they trade draft picks is they will probably be in the bottom quarter of the draft, thus not very valuable.
Meanwhile we read "2nd and 3rd pick" for Miller, no mention that they will not be great picks.