- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.eek, that was an awful call on the luck fumble. I could understand a tuck interpretation there, but an incomplete pass because his arm was going forward?? Not sure about that one.
If it's the same ass then I think he's got something going on the side.
eek, that was an awful call on the luck fumble. I could understand a tuck interpretation there, but an incomplete pass because his arm was going forward?? Not sure about that one.
I'll take it but I still don't get it. When the ball goes backwards isn't it a lateral? The ball never went forward. But like I said I'll gladly take it
Bushanomics and Obamacare rolled into one Mexican QB.Sanchez passing numbers so far:
To Jets - 14 yards, 0 TDs
To Bills - 20 yards, 1 TD
I wonder if Moore is the Jets' version of Giselle?With two strip sacks to his credit Brandon Moore's ass's price in FA would go up even more.
Luck needs to get his head out of his ass and play like a real QB, my man Wilson
In the Refs statement he said incomplete pass because the arm was going foward. I don't think that is what the call should have been, to me that was a clear tuck rule. However I am not sure what the rule is on a backwards latterall in that situation but to me a latterall is an intentional act and the QB's arm is going away from the LOS. In this case his arm is going foward towards the LOS and has it knocked away, I think the arm going foward is the key part.
But I am not 100% on the rule given the circumstance.