- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 19,929
- Reaction score
- 3
Seconded. There's only one guy I really ever take too seriously when it comes to beat reporting on the Patriots and it's Mike Reiss.
You should check out his Welker reporting then...
Although they all make factual mistakes, Mike has the tag value on Welker at two firsts this AM, and it's only 1.
I take opinion from any of them with a grain of salt. I enjoy hearing what they think the team may do. I have little use for what they think the team should do. Personal opinions are like *******s after all. Mike was falling off a cliff last fall with his BB as GM may need replacing blather that all of the others (who routinely deride him as the 5th Kraft son) pointed to as proof positive Bill was losing it. To his credit though, Mike backed off the ledge or the road to another superbowl and admitted his comments were obviously over reactive. They all tend to evolve over time as their ego overrides their job description. Working in an atmosphere that is so competitive and covering a franchise that is tighter lipped than the CIA, the pressure to take stands and offer "independent" or critical opinions that the team often makes you look foolish in hindsight over wears on them. Bedard had his little hissy moment already with the Welker debate. As a result of the grief he's taken in it's aftermath he is now a little testy, which in time could render him worthless if it begins to color his take. He needs to take a page out of Mike's book and learn to question if you must but don't dig yourself a hole you can't see a way out of and then keep digging deeper in the hope you can one day tunnel your way out. That's the Borges method and it's made former print reporters out of most of the last generation of Boston sports mediots and multi-mediot idiot talking heads out of most of this generation.