- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,656
- Reaction score
- 6,113
Interestingly enough, the year the Colts won the Super Bowl (2006 season) was the year he threw the fewest (9).
More ironically he threw 7 in the playoffs that year against only 3 TDs.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Interestingly enough, the year the Colts won the Super Bowl (2006 season) was the year he threw the fewest (9).
Didn't the article basically state that they were very similar in all other stats (by averages, not total volume). It was just the ints that stood out? I don't think it was the end-all-be-all of a single stat, the author was basically stating that the INTs was noticeably the most different (and INTs had a higher correlation to losing).
15 interceptions is not a good year. I'm not sure it makes the perfect cut off point, but it might be as good as any. I can't off the top of my head think of any modern era seasons in which a QB has thrown MORE than 15 picks and had what we'd consider to be a good season.I'm talking about the first link. The second one is older and I've read it before and don't take issue with.
The first one basically says Manning has more INTs than Eli. Not sure why that matters. And not sure why the author selected 15-INTs as the "benchmark" for a lot of INTs. It's a stupid benchmark.
Then he talks about pick 6s thrown. Yeah, obviously, bad to throw them. But of the 4 names listed for most pick 6s thrown, 3 will be first-ballot HOFers. Some guys like Schaub will throw a lot of pick-6s, but they won't throw them for long before getting yanked. You have to have a long career to build up any negative stats. Brady has thrown fewer pick-6s. Then again, Jimmy G has thrown fewer than even Brady. It's a meaningless stat to point out.
Really, the bunch of funny Manningfaces was the highlight of the "article."
I just don't get the cut-off of 15 INTs and what it supposedly means. The article seems to imply it's a benchmark for a bad season, and Manning has 8 of them compared to 0 for Brady. It's an arbitrary point selected to highlight a difference between Manning and Brady. Brady has 3 14-INT seasons while throwing 50ish less passes those seasons, yet Manning gets called out for it. And never mind that he won the MVP award while throwing 15+ INTs in a season, as did Kurt Warner.
Cold Hard Football Facts has some good stuff, but this piece wasn't one of them.
None of this is intended to defend Manning over Brady. It's just to say that 15 INTs in a season by themselves mean absolutely nothing. It could be an MVP season like 2009 Manning or 2014 Andy Dalton's 17 TDs/15 INTs/up and down and all over the place season. You can't tell just by looking at the 15 INTs.
He was awful during those playoffs and the Colts won despite him not because of him. Kind of like Roethlisberger the first time he won the SB.More ironically he threw 7 in the playoffs that year against only 3 TDs.
Red hearing. Now Aaron Rogers vs Brady? Sorry, not sure Tom wins.
I have no idea why Tom Brady vs. Peyton Manning is still a debate.
He was awful during those playoffs and the Colts won despite him not because of him. Kind of like Roethlisberger the first time he won the SB.
From CHFF in October.Does anyone have the dome/outdoors comparisons handy?
From CHFF in October.
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.co...w-tom-brady-better-than-peyton-manning/31873/
- Brady in a dome: 67.4%, 8.64 YPA, 6.9% TD, 2.62% INT, 106.42 rating
- Manning in a dome: 66.16%, 7.8 YPA, 6.1% TD, 2.4% INT, 99.72 rating
- Brady outdoors: 63.15%, 7.35 YPA, 5.39% TD, 1.93% INT, 95.28 rating
- Manning outdoors: 64.97%, 7.62 YPA, 5.66% TD, 2.63% INT, 95.83 rating
Wow, I want you to go on! I never heard that before.
Wow, I want you to go on! I never heard that before.
| 14 | 937 |
| 39 | 4K |
| 108 | 7K |
| 9 | 4K |
| 13 | 418 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











