- Joined
- Jul 31, 2013
- Messages
- 4,027
- Reaction score
- 2,912
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Sorry if it doesn't fit the "Patriots are fools" narrative, but:Multiple sources reported that the Browns were willing to part with a 1st prior to the draft. This move smells of desperation.
Terrible team management. Belching got backed into a corner.
I mean...on the death of the dynasty point, it probably did anyway. The idea that NE would be set at QB thru 2030 or whatever if they could just keep Jimmy G was always, at best, wishful thinking fan fiction.Not sure how I feel about this. I truly felt Garoppolo might be the QB of the future. Trading him now (along with Brisett) all but guarantees that the Patriots dynasty will live and die with Tom Brady .... and most fans I think will be okay with that
I love you, Jimmy.
!!!!
I called this! Makes way too much sense not to happen. We need a backup QB.
Hoyer knows the system....and I would leave it at that....Hoyer is a high end backup QB. That makes me feel better if he's coming back.
For sure. I was sad to see Jimmy go, but my dad texted me that since he’s a Niner then he “stayed in the family.” So I still get to root for him in a way, lol.He should be happy....they just scored majorly....Jimmy should help resurrect that franchise
Colin?You mean Kaepernick, not Kapernick, right? This is important, because I don't want to post Kapernick and get you angry, but if it's Kaepernick, I need to get it correct, in order to avoid offending your feelings.
So...
Kaepernick or Kapernick? Which is verboten?
Being released wouldn't he also be eligible for termination pay, allowing him to " double dip" and get another salary from the Pats which wouldn't happen had he been traded???It's a quirk in the rules that makes no sense.
Impacted the Pats before, too. The Eagles signed Isaac Sopoaga from the 49ers prior to the 2013 season. Pats traded for him at the trading deadline. Not only did he wind up doing nothing and getting benched, but his compensatory status transferred from the Eagles to the Pats too and we lost out of a scheduled 5th round comp pick in 2014.
If you release the player, the liability (if any) still sticks with the signing team. The Steelers signed LaGarrett Blount from the Pats prior to 2014 but cut him after the trade deadline, with the Pats picking him up. The Pats still got a comp pick in 2015 and he still counted against the Steelers in the comp formula because he was released; if he had been traded to the Pats then the Pats would have obtained the liability and thus it would have cancelled out.
Doesn't make sense, but it's how it works.
No thank you. Hes sub-standard, attention grabbing garbage.The other side of the equation is - would Kaep sign? Backup job only, league minimum, and if you say the fans and organization is racist...why would he sign here?????
wir kommen jetzt in Godwins Gesetzesgebiet"Do you know who else would have traded Jimmy away? Hitler, that's who!"
A team's unilateral decision of "Eh, too much trouble to re-sign" sounds a little odd.
I ****ing hate this trade.
We gave up HUGE return value in exchange for an extra 8 weeks of Jimmy holding on to a clipboard on the sidelines.
I can envision BB asking Lynch what he was offering... and then BB telling Brady, " "Hey Tom the 49ers wanted you but only offered xxxx"The ****ing balls on Lynch asking for Brady
| 0 | 453 |
| 11 | 424 |
| 9 | 3K |
| 5 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











