I am confused what you're trying to debate here. I merely posted a fact that I found interesting and you're acting like AndyJohnson.
I'll just take a page out of your playbook and say three people rated my post useful and one hit agree so seems like 4 people at least found it useful. Hehehe. Hahaha.
Also, calm down tiger. I said, its "not why they lost the SB". So, again. Wtf are you even debating my son. You and Andy are frickening hilarious. These posts are so funny.
First, I'm not sure why you think that second paragraph applies to me. My comments about the rating system tend to be when I think people are inappropriately being down rated. Second, I'm discussing both the relevance and level of "interesting" mentioned in your O.P., though mostly the relevance portion.
You don't need a great:
QB (Foles, 2017)
Offense (Broncos, 2015)
Defense (Giants 2011)
RB (Eagles, 2017)
WR (Eagles, 2017)
CB (Eagles, 2017)
Coach (Broncos, 2015)
Pass Rusher (Patriots, 2016)
but that doesn't mean that having any of those things is bad, just like having the MVP on your team doesn't guarantee that your team will win the SB, but it's not a bad thing, and having a guy who throws a boatload of TDs in a particular season doesn't mean you can't win in the playoffs. You took a meaningless coincidence/correlation, and called it a trend, as if there was some kind of causal link, when there's not.
And my first post was just a response to your question as to whether your "trend" was relevant on Sunday, and consisted of me just dismissing the relevance, and not even singling it out for particular ridicule, as I was including it in with other myths and semi-myths.
It means nothing on Sunday. Regardless of who wins on Sunday, it will also mean nothing during the SB. The notion that good defenses always beat offenses is nonsense. The notion that high powered offenses don't win Super Bowls is nonsense. It's all nonsense, and both the eye test regarding the SB winners and the scoring stats of the SB winners prove it.
The team that plays best for a few weeks is the team that wins the Super Bowl, regardless of it's general offense/defense/ST level.
Then, instead of just acknowledging the obvious validity of my post, or leaving it alone, you doubled down on your O.P.. That's not me being Andy. That's you not knowing when to quit.
So, if you don't like being called out for making lame OPs and then doubling down on those lame OPs, stop making lame OPs and doubling down on them.