See this all the time from Brady critics that Brady couldn't have played in a different era where defenses could mug receivers.
Mostly from people who forget that Brady indeed did play in a different era, before 2004 when the Fivehead-lovers on the competition committee made sure defenses couldn't do what the Patriots did to Manning anymore. Won 2 out of 3 Super Bowls in that era too. Knowing how cerebral Brady is and how fast he is releasing the ball I think he would have done really well in any era of the game.
With that said I think a guy like Marino would have feasted on today's rules.
Hilarious, given that the present "emphasis" on playing 2-hand-touch on receivers came from the defensive teammates OF Tom Brady, via Polian of the Colts, he of the Competition Committee. That was the beginning of "change the game to beat the Pats." In that case, they essentially said "OMG, look at this horrible style of defense that nobody every complained about until New England won with it... we're shocked, SHOCKED that DBs have any latitude in close coverage." Later, of course, the whining could not be contained in a simple rules emphasis. They just had to start straight up stealing NE Patriots draft capital.
We soon discovered that team vs team spying -- a "that's football" issue when Saban/Miami did it (
FRAMe (Central Resource to Refute Cameragate Baloney)) -- was tantamount to genocide in the Patriots' case. Also it was more likely than not that Tom Brady was generally aware that if you inverted the data from two gauges... something to do with footballs being flat? FFS.
Why TF are there ANY Tom Brady critics left alive at this point? What don't you like? He's "so smug about getting up at 4 in the morning and outworking the first year guys on the bubble?" "He'll need to get an 8th ring to convince me it's not just luck"?
I mean F(*&. Any takers for "System quarterback?" Jay Z christ.
I frankly am sort of sick of TFB the man. I mean, for example, I hate that his politics suck. (Stipulated, a lot of you guys are wrong and agree with his politics. JUST KIDDING. you know, good natured, in jest, we ain't solving it here.) I hate that I disagree w his politics. I don't WANT to continue a man crush on TFB, but he is really. good. at effing football. I'm also aware that if someone said "Here's PFnV, he won the Dinner With Tom Brady contest," the look on his face would be "this is going to be a long half an hour. They can't possibly expect an hour." I am sure he's a guy some of you guys think you'd want to get a beer with, but I guaranty you, that's a 1-way deal. That's fandom. Probably that's more the case w Brady than most, b/c rather than measuring from basic football player down the chain of existence to the shlub fan, the distance w Brady is to greatest football player ever. Nevertheless, it makes me think "yeah prolly a ****."
But TB
critics, in the sense of saying he doesn't have game? Put down the legalized recreational marijuana ya freakin wook and watch some NFL network "Top 100" footage or something.
Okay done