Calling me spoiled because I'm of the opinion that Brady made Belichick and therefore Belichick is overrated is dumb.
It's not very satisfying in a long, long off-season, but the comparison is between Brady/Belichick/Krafts and their constantly changing cast of characters vs. other franchises.
The alignment of that grouping in New England has been the NE version of "triplets." While all these other fool teams were searching to hit the lottery and get "triplets" in the draft because that's what Dallas did, the Pats had QB with, it turned out, an outstanding will to win and work ethic that kept raising the bar on his upside in terms of pure stat performance (peaking in 07 but plateauing at an elite level).
But to your point about who made who? The idea that BB is "exposed" w/o Brady? Just no, no matter how dumb you think it is that people think that's what you're saying. All we know is that Brady went to a super-stacked team, where Trent Dilfer could pass for 30 TDs, and won a wildcard berth, and after two decades of dominance, BB went through his first Brady-less year cash-strapped, you know the COVID facts, and so forth, and yeah this year was, by Pats standards, less than stellar.
I do get it -- you just want BB knocked down to human scale, which gives you more room for it to matter what you say to do next (and to vent about his coaching sins.) Okay, free country, and here's hoping you should be roundly ridiculed b/c BB rears up and destroys all before him in a year or 2. Who knows. Right now I'm in "In Bill We Trust" mode, thinking maybe this year was always going to be pretty horrid.
Thanks for the conversation, though, because this way if Washington wins I still win... "Yeah too bad BB didn't get us a wild card, 1-and-done season..."
Likely I get to follow TFB for at least a couple games, since the Pats are out of it.