lancerman
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,161
- Reaction score
- 11,104
I think it's a different team with Brady. This team either way would be a more effective running team than a passing team. Cam has 328 attempts. The last time Brady played a 16 game season and didn't hit 570 at a minimum was 2010.You said the games wouldn't of unfolded the same. So I dono what he would of done.
Surely you aren't saying this team is better with cam then brady. No one would actually make that claim right?
So I guess I have to flip it to you and ask this: Is taking roughly 200 snaps this year away from our running attack which is clearly the best part of our offense worth having a better passing QB who still has to work with complete garbage? That's a real tough question because I don't know if these guys are going to get open enough to justify that even if Cam has been missing them sometimes when they are open. I don't really see there being that much extra value to be had out of an improved passer when the receivers are this bad.
That does not mean I think Cam is remotely close to Brady as a QB. He's not even in the tier below him. But we still might be better off selling out for the run the way are because the receiving corp is crippled.
Brady might get us an extra win or two that a complete trash QB play prevented us from. But on average it's going to be Brady getting pissed again and throwing the ball away because he isn't liking the looks
Last edited: