venecol
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2015
- Messages
- 22,701
- Reaction score
- 28,230
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It’s baffling that there’s no specific party for fiscal conservative/social progressives, since that seems to be the majority of people. Libertarian is probably the closest in ideology, but it also takes those concepts a lot further than the traditional norm, which many like us tend to also value.
I honestly dont care about the free thousand dollars.
I'm not leaving the house to spend it anyway
They did and then Trump dismantled it
Outright giving $1,000 to each American is a terrible idea. The level of credit card debt we are in, as a country, should tell you that Americans can’t manage their finances (by and large). You put $1,000 in the hands of each American, there’s going to be a large percentage that spends it on new Jordan’s, furniture, hair, clothes, watches, etc. Instead, why not make them bring their past due utility bills/car notes/mortgage payments/rent/etc, verify the info, and pay the debtors directly up to $1,000 max to get them back on track? It’s disgraceful that we even need to talk about doing this anyway.
A nanny state?Outright giving $1,000 to each American is a terrible idea. The level of credit card debt we are in, as a country, should tell you that Americans can’t manage their finances (by and large). You put $1,000 in the hands of each American, there’s going to be a large percentage that spends it on new Jordan’s, furniture, hair, clothes, watches, etc. Instead, why not make them bring their past due utility bills/car notes/mortgage payments/rent/etc, verify the info, and pay the debtors directly up to $1,000 max to get them back on track? It’s disgraceful that we even need to talk about doing this anyway.
You put $1,000 in the hands of each American, there’s going to be a large percentage that spends it on new Jordan’s, furniture, hair, clothes, watches, etc.
What's the hurry? It's not like there's any sports to bet it on
Actually you have been lied to, see this OpEd in the Washington Post from the person who headed that section:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-didnt-dissolve-its-pandemic-response-office/
Now ask the question, what sort of political hack would tell a lie to politicize this sort of thing. Perhaps they remember R. Emmanuel's advice " Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste.
I’m spitting out hypotheticals that are as ridiculous as the Federal Government giving every American $1,000 of tax payer money as a loan to pay bills. And yes, sale of Jordan’s would skyrocket. If this happens, buy stock in Nike and sell it the day after. You will have made a nice profit.Verify how every American spends money? Do you want to wait years as systems are built to do that? And any idea how much that would cost to build a system like that?
Plus mentioning "Jordans" as the first thing folks would spend money on?
I can get you an 8-ball of fentanyl on the low low if you want. Snort a HUGE line of it, though. It only works if you take it in large doses.A nanny state?
Kontra how much for an 8-ball nowadays?
I’m spitting out hypotheticals that are as ridiculous as the Federal Government giving every American $1,000 of tax payer money as a loan to pay bills. And yes, sale of Jordan’s would skyrocket. If this happens, buy stock in Nike and sell it the day after. You will have made a nice profit.
I had a feeling that’s what you meant by your previous post “Michael Jordan would approve”.You put $1,000 in the hands of each American, there’s going to be a large percentage that spends it on new Jordan’s,
Depends on how fiscally conservative we are talking. There is the fairly conservative economic policy that is adopted by most Republicans and Democrats (by world standards) and the Ron Paul’s who are super fiscally conservative. Most fall into the former. I’d call those people centrists. Being hard right on the economic spectrum, your much closer to “libertarianism”. Though true libertarianism is much much less government than most people understand.It’s baffling that there’s no specific party for fiscal conservative/social progressives, since that seems to be the majority of people. Libertarian is probably the closest in ideology, but it also takes those concepts a lot further than the traditional norm, which many like us tend to also value.
What's the source of this chart. I'd like to keep up with it.
That’s on the redneck side, yes. Same with Bush Light and Marlboros. Jordan’s would be on the hood side. You seem butthurt about that. Not a whole lot of time around the lower income African American communities, eh? They may not be able to pay their bills in a given month, but they’ll be damned if they’re not looking fly AF.