Yes, you did. And thanks for telling us your interpretation of what he said to you. He never said anything like that publicly, so either:
A. You're lying about him saying it, or
B. You're lying that you never cried directly to Ian, since that would have been a PM in response to you directly crying to him.
Which is it?
You do lie. That's not what the word honk means. I have never once heard it...if you Google it, you will not find that definition in numerous dictionaries. If you type in "honk sexist" you would not find anything about that. What you did was dishonestly insert yourself into someone else's exchange and made something up...that word has been used here over and over again and has always meant homer. To think a long-time board member would essentially call a moderator the equivalent of "a bimbo" when no one has ever done that or would ever do that for many reasons. If you made an honest (reprehensible) mistake, you would contact Ashley and let her know this was your mistake, but you won't. Why? Because you're a dishonest, pass-the-buck ******* who never believes he's at fault for anything.
You should take it up with Ashley. You had no problem taking it up with her when it was your dishonest agenda.
Guerrero said what I've said for several years. Bill's coaching philosophy worked well for a long time but didn't adapt to his veteran players. And that worked fine in the past, but this time he had no succession plan to replace them, the stakes were higher with these two players, and he miscalculated their productive years.