PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Brady Sr. Says what I’ve been saying all along.

Remember when you cried to Ian to get rid of Brady threads because this is a Patriots forum and had a screaming fit about it? Why, then, are you on the Tom Brady forum smearing the threads with your diarrhea? And why do you spend 90% of your time crying about Brady like a jilted ex-lover? What was your username again? Oh right…TommyBrady12. Can’t make up the level of bandwagon ****roach-ness…lol.
Just put them all on ignore. I have them on ignore but could not resist posting the videos at Illegal because he made it so easy when he said Bill is not a sore loser. I just couldn't resist. LOL
 
LOL Alex Guerroro chimes in...apparently Brady wanted to be treated differently than the other 52 guys on the roster. Guerrero says 40-year-olds should be treated differently, but I think the reality is Brady wanted GOAT status with Belichick (i.e., I'm the GOAT, treat me different than the others).

I cannot stand Alex Guerrero.

I appreciate the support he's given TB12 when he played for the NEP but now.....f-k that little s-t.

If it wasn't for Tom he'd be a massage therapist for Massage Envy in Norton, MA or in MCI Shirley for wire fraud.
 
I’m gonna have to bail out from this forum if obvious troll accounts have free reign to now only wreck threads in the main forum but also in our sequestered Brady forum which is already a ridiculous thing.
 
Remember when you cried to Ian to get rid of Brady threads because this is a Patriots forum and had a screaming fit about it? Why, then, are you on the Tom Brady forum smearing the threads with your diarrhea? And why do you spend 90% of your time crying about Brady like a jilted ex-lover? What was your username again? Oh right…TommyBrady12. Can’t make up the level of bandwagon ****roach-ness…lol.
Amazing how posters who whined and complained about Brady fans brigading the main forum now come running to the forum set up to discuss him.
 
Remember when you cried to Ian to get rid of Brady threads because this is a Patriots forum and had a screaming fit about it? Why, then, are you on the Tom Brady forum smearing the threads with your diarrhea? And why do you spend 90% of your time crying about Brady like a jilted ex-lover? What was your username again? Oh right…TommyBrady12. Can’t make up the level of bandwagon ****roach-ness…lol.

What's the matter, do you not like reading articles making Brady look bad? And I never cried directly to Ian. He was sick of Bradyites like you. If I posted the Guerrero article on the mainboard, it would get moved here. In any event, this article has to do with Tom's time here in NE. Your Gronkaneers thread has to do with your team, the Bucs.
 
He shook Tom Coughlin's hand, didn't he?

Are you going to lie again about the meaning of a word, like claiming honk is sexist and cry to get someone banned?

You have zero respect for the moderators. They’re adults with lives, not an incel loser dwelling in his parents spare bedroom. You screamed and cried until Ian created a sub-forum and coded a way to compromise, all because you’re a little ****y. Then you come to the forum he created and troll here.

Pretty soon this forum will get in your head - as it always does - and you’ll retreat to your safe space. I’ll make sure of it. You’re soft and can’t handle yourself.
 
It’s almost like THEY’RE the disruptive influence and not us.
I thought I had read it all until I was informed yesterday that it was in fact Brady that lost Super Bowl 52 for the Patriots.
 
  • Ha Ha
Reactions: sb1
Are you going to lie again about the meaning of a word, like claiming honk is sexist and cry to get someone banned?

You have zero respect for the moderators. They’re adults with lives, not an incel loser dwelling in his parents spare bedroom. You screamed and cried until Ian created a sub-forum and coded a way to compromise, all because you’re a little ****y. Then you come to the forum he created and troll here.

Pretty soon this forum will get in your head - as it always does - and you’ll retreat to your safe space. I’ll make sure of it. You’re soft and can’t handle yourself.

I didn't lie. The word "honk" has been used to mean "attractive woman with no brains" - you know the kind you honk your horn at if you see on the street. And if you don't like Deus getting banned, maybe you should take it up with Ashley. It was her decision even after Deus explained himself.

Now how about responding to Guerrero's comments? Apparently you didn't like the Guerrero article and now are going after me.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Belichick shouldn’t have spilled his guts to Seth Wickersham in 500 page hit piece.
Bill wouldn't be stupid enough to say anything negative about Brady himself.
It's possible he criticized Guerrero though.
 
I cannot stand Alex Guerrero.

I appreciate the support he's given TB12 when he played for the NEP but now.....f-k that little s-t.

If it wasn't for Tom he'd be a massage therapist for Massage Envy in Norton, MA or in MCI Shirley for wire fraud.

The more I think about it, the more I feel Guerrero was the reason for the Brady/NEP split. Bill didn't want him around since it would show favoritism towards Brady over the other 52 guys, and Brady felt he was entitled to have Guerrero part of the team. It seems to make sense now - around SB 51 there were rumblings that Bill wanted Jimmy G to take over. It seems like Bill wanted Brady gone over Guerrero.
 
Last edited:
Team Bill cried because anything Brady related shouldn't be on the main board since Brady is no longer a Patriot. Now the Brady threads aren't on the main board and they still cry. Team Bill is just fragile and grasping.


you're the one that sounds fragile and grasping
 
you're the one that sounds fragile and grasping
Yet here you are in a Tom Brady forum even though the mere mention of his name causes you to post "He's gone. There is no Tom Brady" You're like Pavlov's dog hearing the dinner bell. If Brady doesn't exist why are you even looking at this forum?
 
What's the matter, do you not like reading articles making Brady look bad? And I never cried directly to Ian. He was sick of Bradyites like you.
Yes, you did. And thanks for telling us your interpretation of what he said to you. He never said anything like that publicly, so either:

A. You're lying about him saying it, or
B. You're lying that you never cried directly to Ian, since that would have been a PM in response to you directly crying to him.

Which is it?
I didn't lie. The word "honk" has been used to mean "attractive woman with no brains" - you know the kind you honk your horn at if you see on the street.
You do lie. That's not what the word honk means. I have never once heard it...if you Google it, you will not find that definition in numerous dictionaries. If you type in "honk sexist" you would not find anything about that. What you did was dishonestly insert yourself into someone else's exchange and made something up...that word has been used here over and over again and has always meant homer. To think a long-time board member would essentially call a moderator the equivalent of "a bimbo" when no one has ever done that or would ever do that for many reasons. If you made an honest (reprehensible) mistake, you would contact Ashley and let her know this was your mistake, but you won't. Why? Because you're a dishonest, pass-the-buck ******* who never believes he's at fault for anything.
And if you don't like Deus getting banned, maybe you should take it up with Ashley. It was her decision even after Deus explained himself.
You should take it up with Ashley. You had no problem taking it up with her when it was your dishonest agenda.
Now how about responding to Guerrero's comments? You didn't like the Guerrero article and now are going after me.
Guerrero said what I've said for several years. Bill's coaching philosophy worked well for a long time but didn't adapt to his veteran players. And that worked fine in the past, but this time he had no succession plan to replace them, the stakes were higher with these two players, and he miscalculated their productive years.
 
The more I think about it, the more I feel Guerrero was the reason for the Brady/NEP split. Bill didn't want him around since it would show favoritism towards Brady over the other 52 guys, and Brady felt he was entitled to have Guerrero part of the team. It seems to make sense now - around SB 51 there were rumblings that Bill wanted Jimmy G to take over. It seems like Bill wanted Brady gone over Guerrero.
As much as I hate that little puke I don't blame him for the split.

Tom is his own man and he wanted something different than what he had experienced the first ~15 years with the team. He earned that right.

Bill felt Tom was no longer on board with his program and moved on.
 
Yes, you did. And thanks for telling us your interpretation of what he said to you. He never said anything like that publicly, so either:

A. You're lying about him saying it, or
B. You're lying that you never cried directly to Ian, since that would have been a PM in response to you directly crying to him.

Which is it?

You do lie. That's not what the word honk means. I have never once heard it...if you Google it, you will not find that definition in numerous dictionaries. If you type in "honk sexist" you would not find anything about that. What you did was dishonestly insert yourself into someone else's exchange and made something up...that word has been used here over and over again and has always meant homer. To think a long-time board member would essentially call a moderator the equivalent of "a bimbo" when no one has ever done that or would ever do that for many reasons. If you made an honest (reprehensible) mistake, you would contact Ashley and let her know this was your mistake, but you won't. Why? Because you're a dishonest, pass-the-buck ******* who never believes he's at fault for anything.

You should take it up with Ashley. You had no problem taking it up with her when it was your dishonest agenda.

Guerrero said what I've said for several years. Bill's coaching philosophy worked well for a long time but didn't adapt to his veteran players. And that worked fine in the past, but this time he had no succession plan to replace them, the stakes were higher with these two players, and he miscalculated their productive years.

Prove it that I directly contacted Ian via PM or otherwise to have the Gronkaneer thread moved from last year. SUre I complained about it, but Ian did what was right - he moved a non-patriots related thread to a different forum. I'm not sure why YOU are complaining about it. You should be happy.

And yeah, I heard differently about the word "honk." Ashley is a grown woman and she can google it herself and make up her own mind. She was getting sick of Deus on that thread anyway, so whatever. On the other hand, I never heard of the word "honk" as meaning "homer." Maybe this word has multiple connotations that I was unaware of- whatever.
 
As much as I hate that little puke I don't blame him for the split.

Tom is his own man and he wanted something different than what he had experienced the first ~15 years with the team. He earned that right.

Bill felt Tom was no longer on board with his program and moved on.

I appreciate this perspective. Most will not acknowledge this and blame everything on nonsensical reasons.

Bill no longer wanted Tom. Tom no longer wanted Bill. I believe that is more of the case than "Tom no longer wanted to be a Patriot"; while that statement is true, it's because he no longer wanted to play for Bill, or live by Bill's standards, or accept Bill's idea of a commitment.

If Robert Kraft, seeing that his greatest player/icon was at odds with the coach/GM, he could have chosen to keep Tom over Bill. Ultimately I see this as a case where Belichick is who he is and can't change his stripes. Some of the same things that made him great - consistency and rigidness -can also be problematic depending on the situation, and this was one of them. In that sense, I am at peace with what Bill did. I am more annoyed by the alternate narratives being spun.
 
Prove it that I directly contacted Ian via PM or otherwise to have the Gronkaneer thread moved from last year. SUre I complained about it, but Ian did what was right - he moved a non-patriots related thread to a different forum. I'm not sure why YOU are complaining about it. You should be happy.
If you're going to ask me to meet the standard of proof of law enforcement, then I'll need subpoena power. Send me all of your PMs or password, or stop coming up with ridiculous cop-outs like asking me to prove you didn't PM Ian when we both know I have no access to your PMs.

You complained about it, as I said. You caused him to partition the forum, create a way for people to get notifications at the top of the main page (to see all forums), and created a problem when there was none. Then, despite Ian going to great lengths to separate the Brady/non-Brady advocates, you tread over to the Brady forum to annoy people, troll, and be a general *******. What's so complicated about this? You wanted two camps and a line drawn, and now you're over on the other side picking fights.

I have zero issue with others coming to the Brady forum to ***** and moan or give an anti-Brady take; I have an issue when someone does it, when that person complained and compelled the board's owner to create a safe space for him.
 
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/23: Vrabel Set to Miss Day 3 of Draft ‘Seeking Counseling’
MORSE: Final Patriots Mock Draft
MORSE: Final Patriots Mock Draft
Mark Morse
13 hours ago
Former Patriots Super Bowl MVP Set to Announce Pick During Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Media Statement on Tuesday 4/21
MORSE: What Will the Patriots Do in the Draft?
MORSE: Patriots Prospects and 30 Visits
Patriots News 04-19, Countdown To Draft Day
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
Back
Top