I can't imagine Kraft trying to interfere with how Belichick does things with the team. Like was said earlier, Felger doesn't know anything about anything.
I agree with your 2nd sentence. As for the first, I give you Jimmy Garrapolo.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I can't imagine Kraft trying to interfere with how Belichick does things with the team. Like was said earlier, Felger doesn't know anything about anything.
Are you saying that he’d better watch his back?Dorsett will be in shooting distance of AB. I won't go further and explain that one...
We'll have a ruling by Friday, 4pm. That's when the league offices close for the weekend so we'll know at the very least if AB is playing this Sunday or not, by that time.
I agree with your 2nd sentence. As for the first, I give you Jimmy Garrapolo.
They knew of the videos or could have easily found out about the video but they wanted to keep people ignorant and keep the show going, good for ratings.Hey look, they started talking about the videos on WEEI two minutes before the show ends....
AB looking more innocent as the day goes on.
Yeah, his infertile wife wanted him to. I guess it was a surrogate mother type of thing. She wasn't necessarily a maid with a feather duster. She could have been a beefy farm worker with two teeth knocked out. Abraham took one for the team. UPDATE: by the way, that incident with Abraham makes my point. He had sex outside marriage and it ended up causing jealousy between the two women and Abraham had to send the slave and child (Ishmael) away. The child's descendants haunted Israel afterward. Consequences.
I'm not delusional, in case that is what you are inferring.
I personally think she is lying and she is probably a Titans fan since she lives in Memphis and hate the Pats so that would explain the timing...with that being said,Antonio Brown has a reputation for being a diva,crybaby and a bad locker room guy with an attitude so his past will reflect on his future in the eyes of many,even if he is innocent of rape charges...which I think he is.@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
However...The use of the Commissioner’s exempt list (or paid leave) is not available based on the filing of an unsworn civil lawsuit. Available only where there are formal criminal charges or following an NFL investigation. (See NFL Personal Conduct Policy below). Neither has happened yet.
But there is this language to consider: If the commissioner “suspects” that there has been a “crime of violence,” he can use exempt list on a “limited and temporary basis” to allow the NFL to conduct an investigation. But how can one “suspect” anything from an unsworn complaint.
I thought he was a loser scumbag before, I still do and always will.@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
As they say a lie can go half way around the world before the truth gets to put on its shoes. If she is lying and does not win the case, there will be just one line written about it and then people move on but those who don't like him will always think of him as a rapist. Damage is done.@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
Yes. Any thought that sprung from that evolution did so arbitrarily. There was no morality, then there was. It didn't exist from the beginning of time, unless you believe in intelligent design, which I don't. Anyone who does will surely disagree with me and that's valid.
Then it’s brain chemistry includes morality.Because its brain chemistry dictates its behavior.
@TheRainMaker mentioned something interesting in this threat that I didn't consider till now.
The accuser won't win her case. Even with the lower standard of proof unless she can get Brown to admit to it or has some kind of audio/video evidence she won't win.
My question is this: Assuming she loses the case will that change how anyone feels and should feel about it? Just because she will probably lose that doesn't prove she is lying. I wonder after the fact how much that will influence people's perception if at all?
Would her losing make you more convinced she is lying or would it not change your view at all?
| 50 | 3K |
| 40 | 3K |
| 16 | 1K |
| 63 | 7K |
| 14 | 944 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











