- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Quarterbacks don't win by themselves, coaching/GMing in GB is pathetic. Aaron has more talent and is better than TB, but he's not the GOAT.
Your post doesn't make sense
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Quarterbacks don't win by themselves, coaching/GMing in GB is pathetic. Aaron has more talent and is better than TB, but he's not the GOAT.
Brees > the Fivehead.
I think Rodgers vs Peyton at #2 is a debate. Rodgers may lose because he had to sit for the first three years of his career, so Peyton gets a big start out of the gate. But if you adjust for that, it's pretty close. I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions given that it's not a topic that's discussed that much, given that everyone's just compared to Brady.
I don't think Rodgers is competitive with Manning. For all of Manning's short comings at the end of games they were typically in the playoffs. But Manning could get it done in the 4th quarter during the regular season. Rodgers can't even do that. Not to mention when Rodgers has a bad defense he has losing seasons, with ironically the 15-1 year being the lone exception. Manning had 5 or 6 winning seasons with his defense ranked low 20's or worse.
I just don't put Rodgers in that category. Fun to watch, great arm but turtles in the biggest of moments in not so big games..
Quarterbacks don't win by themselves, coaching/GMing in GB is pathetic. Aaron has more talent and is better than TB, but he's not the GOAT.
2015: Packers 27 Seahawks 17 (10-6)
2016 Playoffs: Packers 34 Cowboys 31 (13-3)
Both of these were 4th quarter comebacks (albeit it as small as can be, one point comebacks) against teams with a winning record by Rodgers, so this stat is false.
Reading is fundamentalThe ball-washing of Rodgers is insufferable and the fact that those two games are his only comebacks of such nature indeed emphasize he's not as clutch as people think but there's no need to spread fake stats to prove that point.
Brady is clearly better, more clutch, etc. than Rodgers, let's always remember to use the mountain of real stats to make this case instead of needing fake ones.
No. The stat says trailing BY MORE THAN 1
Aaron Rodgers has never had a 4th qtr comeback against a team with a winning record.
There is a link to the research.The original post of this thread, which I am replying to.
Reading is fundamental
There is a link to the research.
I was taking about the fact not whether a poster misquoted it.That link is not in the original post.
The majority of people in the thread are replying the original post, which is incorrect.
I was taking about the fact not whether a poster misquoted it.
You said "reading is fundamental" for a fact that was not posted anywhere in the original post to be read which is completely illogical.
Not going to waste more posts to explain this to you.
You said the stat was made up. It’s not.
Sorry you don’t have a sense of humor.
The real stat is real. The end.The original post is a made up stat. My post is a response to that.
The end. (OK, I wasted one more post on this)
He's actually 1-22 against winning teams when trailing at the start of the 4th quarter. They talked about it this morning. However, this is a glaring stat that continues to be ignored.Aaron Rodgers has never had a 4th qtr comeback against a team with a winning record.
"But, but he can make all the throws"!
Sorry if this has been posted prior, but I just heard this on radio and could not believe it. And some people actually think he is better then Brady. By this fact alone I think he is barely a top 10 QB all time.
I disagree. Aside from Rodgers first few years when he had Jennings, Nelson and Finley in their prime, the Packers always had some glaring weakness they couldn't overcome but the media chose to ignore. Finley deteriorated and had to retire. Running game was very inconsistent and then became non existent. The defense has always been terrible.Quarterbacks don't win by themselves, coaching/GMing in GB is pathetic. Aaron has more talent and is better than TB, but he's not the GOAT.
I told all of you he was the jumpy punk discount double dork narcissist he's always been...way back when Brady was being eviscerated by that damnable scumbag Turdell. "Erring" closed his yap like a giant clam at the Great Barrier reef and let his so-called "good friend" Brady twist in the fiery wind of that repugnant witch hunt. **** him and the jackazz he rode in on. I hate that egomaniacal azzole with a vengeance. He rides on this magic carpet of broken play jumping throws that make ESPN highlights like it's a friggin religious experience. Have you ever wondered WHY he's always breaking out of the pocket and throwing across his body all the time? It's because he's AVERAGE when it comes to reading defenses and always has been.
Can't stand this arrogant POS and find it constantly aggravating that THIS fanbase puts so much energy into lusting for HIM over the greatest QB to ever play the game.
2015: Packers 27 Seahawks 17 (10-6)
2016 Playoffs: Packers 34 Cowboys 31 (13-3)
Both of these were 4th quarter comebacks (albeit it as small as can be, one point comebacks) against teams with a winning record by Rodgers, so this stat is false.
The ball-washing of Rodgers is insufferable and the fact that those two games are his only comebacks of such nature indeed emphasize he's not as clutch as people think but there's no need to spread fake stats to prove that point.
Brady is clearly better, more clutch, etc. than Rodgers, let's always remember to use the mountain of real stats to make this case instead of needing fake ones.
And, in case anyone is wondering, I did not forget about Eli, Flacco or Palmer (might have made it if he hadn't had that knee injury that changed his career).