- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 18,967
- Reaction score
- 29,376
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.thought this was pretty cool...
maybe there's hope for this years SB show
I have a hard time thinking of Soundgarden without Cornell's vocals.
Maybe it will be great, but Soundgarden without Chris is just a cover band playing their songs.
thought this was pretty cool...
maybe there's hope for this years SB show
But it was Eddie and Chris' singing that made it what it was..Mike McCready joining is fine as Chris, Matt and Mike had the tribute band "Temple of the Dog".
Genesis and Van Halen were very successful and some debate that the lead replacement was actually an improvement.There are very rare examples of bands continuing on without their original lead singer. Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden, AC/DC and there may be others I can't think of. I wouldn't put Alice in Chains in this category because Jerry Cantrell would sing on many of the songs.
90's Soundgarden was insane though and one of my favorite bands growing up. I was a 90's grunge kid.
I don't care for Taylor Momson. Female rock singers are just too cheesy and try to hard. Linkin Park is embarrassing with their new singer.
Mike McCready joining is fine as Chris, Matt and Mike had the tribute band "Temple of the Dog".
As someone who grew up with Van Halen, Van Haggar was not even remotely close to Van Halen with DLR.Genesis and Van Halen were very successful and some debate that the lead replacement was actually an improvement.
Others disagree.As someone who grew up with Van Halen, Van Haggar was not even remotely close to Van Halen with DLR.
They had great commercial success with Sammy as they went more main stream/softer with their music. Great for them, bad for the original VH fans.
Many others.Others disagree.
From our archive - this week all-time:
August 22 - September 6 (Through 26yrs)











