I’d be okay with that, but my dream is a little different. I’m with you through the bye week work being rewarded. But my dream is that the real work got done with BB sitting down with the coaching staff and clarifying that “offensive” is an attacking role, not an unpleasant aesthetic. Maybe telling Judge it’s his turn and if the results aren’t better than Matt’s his Christmas bonus will be straight out of ****ens. The real reward being an OL performance that physically abuses the Vikings as a stellar run game sets up effective play action and an unstoppable dink and dunk passing game.
FIFY. I’m thinking the OL does a better job of run blocking because they’ve gotten it together during the bye week, plus the Vikings D isn‘t as good as our most recent opponent. We Rham it down their throats whether they want to allow it or not.
Quoth the Good Playbook,
"Judge not, lest ye be Judged." I actually don't have a preference among the hot stove villains league, especially since we don't even really know who does what. I mean, we know that Patricia is fatter. If it were the other way around we'd probably be spitting venom about pudgy Judgy or Joe Pudge or something. I'm surprised that our savants haven't lighted on Belly Check or Smelly Czech or something, even if he is Croatian. Or whatever he is. Shlitzposting is shlitzposting whether in grade school, on some crazy hate bulletin board, or in here. Rule one, do not name your son Benjamin if your last name is Dover, unless you plan to be saddled with 12 years of home schooling. A rhyming nickname is much easier to establish than compelling commentary on capabilities.
But you didn't say any of that, you just wanted more Judge, less Patricia, okay, I neither agree nor vehemently disgree.
I like the idea of Rhamming until they can stop Rham, but I also like the idea of taking our opportunities to beat a secondary that can be had, no scratch that, can be victimized.
In Dingleberry's place, I picked the TEs to score TDs, seeing as we will look 9 feet tall and bulletproof to MN, and they are going to try not to look TOO bad getting beat downfield... they are less sus against the run than the pass.
So I think this is really a game tailor-made for a good Mac Jones showing. But it takes a LOT this season to make him really look good. I think the gift of yardage will be a simple enough matter, but the gift of red zone scoring will be harder to secure. I'd love 8 pinpoint accurat back corner fades into the end zone for Mac, but being realistic, if I'm him I want a big target who carries the ball and my stats over the goal line.