This is complete garbage on your part. Claiming that Daniel's rookie year was as good as Mac's is laughable.
In what reality is a 61.9% completion % better than a 67.6%?
It what reality is 38 sacks (in 13 games) taken better than 28 sacks (in 17 games) taken?
It what reality is an 87.7 Rate better than a 92.5 rate?
In what reality is 3027 yards on 284 completions better than 3801 yards on 352 completions?
My point wasn't Daniel Jones had as good a rookie season as Mac Jones... my point was Daniel Jones had a promising rookie season. All of the promise went in the toilet under Joe Judge, who was an awful HC for the NYG.
As for your numbers, of course you picked out ones that favored Mac. I did the same, picked out numbers that favored DJ... he had more TDs (with 4 fewer games), a higher TD%, fewer INTs (again with fewer games but the INT% were essentially the same), and he averaged 6.2 yards per carry (compared with Mac at 2.9). Yes, Mac had more passing yards, but again he had more starts, the better number to look at is Y/G where DJ was higher.
I don't see what's so laughable about comparing their rookie seasons? They're not that far apart. Ultimately I don't care if Mac's was actually better, again my point was DJ showed enough in his rookie season that his 2nd and 3rd seasons were highly disappointing.
Daniel Jones: 62% passing, 88 QB Rating, 38 sacks, 6.6 YPA
Mac Jones: 68% passing, 93 QB Rating, 28 sacks, 7.3 YPA on 62 more passing attempts.
Yeah they ^ were practically brothers.
You, also, cherry-picking numbers. I already presented the numbers where DJ is better.
Let's not forget DJ had a huge disadvantage with the head coach. Whatever excuses you want to make for Judge, there's no way you are putting him up there with Belichick. Considering how incredibly in over his head Judge was, it's no surprise how badly DJ and the offense played (statistically no offense was worse).
You're an alarmist and a negative Nancy, you crap in the punch bowl any opportunity you can... of course you think the sky is falling.
The Pats won three Super Bowls with both coaches on the staff... funny how their horrible coaching wasn't a problem then.
The sky isn't falling because Judge and Patricia are losers. No, they didn't f*ck up Super Bowl winning seasons... I certainly hope not as assistant coaches to Belichick. But I'm just stating a fact in that both were inept head coaches. Patricia took over a reasonably competent Lions team and immediately put them in the gutter. He got fired and left behind the worst defense in the league. Judge left behind the worst offense in the league so at least they got both sides of the ball covered. Belichick apparently loves theses guys... taking them back into prominent positions. I don't get it but Belichick would have us believe it's in the best interest of the team... we're going to find out either way.