DW Toys
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
- Messages
- 4,450
- Reaction score
- 1,890
Fair assessment Cousin, but my issue is the number of picks we would have to move up to get Fields.....who in my worthless opinion.....is overrated. In evaluation, it was noted by some so called Draft "experts" that Darnold would be the third QB taken if he was in this 2021 Draft. So Lawrence, Wilson and Darnold.FACT Fields threw to his first read less than any QBs in this draft. And he was more successful on non first read throws than any of them.
Literally the reason you don’t like fields is 100% backward and if that’s your criteria you actually like fields.
Would you trade two number #1 picks and two #2 picks for Darnold? If I am "buying the groceries" , I have seen the tape. I don't know whet everyone sees in Fields. I am missing something. I still see a typical OSU QB and here is the shocker, Haskins might have had the better arm.
Again I will say. If we get him, fine. He is just not my cup of tea. I see things that you don't.
A step further, as much as I hate Mond's terrible completion number and inconsistencies, I would rather keep our picks and grab Mond in the 4th Round. I like Davis and Trask better. Any of them better than Fields? Perhaps not at this time........ but you look at the tape on Trask and compare it to Fields and if you could stand pat and not have to give up picks, you might consider Trask. Trask had more yards, more TDs passing and a completeion rate about the same. ..........Just for comparison purposes.
My two would be Lance perhaps at Detroit's #7 and our pick #46 (fair according to the Draft Trade charts) or the under the radar Davis with no picks involved at #46 or #96.
My opinion for fun only. No bones need be broken or households torched.
DW Toys