- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments....I loved Johnson for a minute but was a little nervous bc Tom and the depth there. I still think he's quite the player. He just missed a 2nd round grade for me...
Those people sound like ******s. Maybe they should use the ignore thread option.The reasons have been stated repeatedly. You can disagree with them if you like, but it's ridiculous to assert you can't imagine why someone would object to discussing players who are not New England Patriots in a New England Patriots forum.
It's one thing to object but we're 100 pages in. No one cares. Certainly not the mods.The reasons have been stated repeatedly. You can disagree with them if you like, but it's ridiculous to assert you can't imagine why someone would object to discussing players who are not New England Patriots in a New England Patriots forum.
Umm.....
The poster doesn't like us having a thread about Tom and Gronk in this location, so he starts posting unrelated posts (the TB cheerleaders were ok though) and after a few back and forth posts uses those as the reason to have it moved. There must be a word for that brand of dishonesty.
Silly me for thinking an adult would or could have deductive reasoning to see the thread title and know the only reason there'd be a thread like this on the board would be specifically because Tom Brady is there. But it's you, so I see my expectations were set too high.
Might get a bit more of a look at him this week
Those people sound like ******s. Maybe they should use the ignore thread option.
I think so. I wonder in a regular off season with more time if he wouldn't see extended reps there. Everyone lost hundreds of reps so it may be in the cards in the future. Plus that could be a dominate left side with Marpet.@BaconGrundleCandy Could Wirfs and Smith just swap LT and RT positions? Seems like Wirfs is the better tackle, but I’m sure there’s a lot more to it.
Godwin is out. Evans is a huge WR. Haven't really seen Howard or Brates be used much as pass catchers. This entire Tampa offense is still in flux. Plus their LT is gone for the year. Brady's bread and butter is short passes to the middle and slot. coach's scheme is deep vertical offense. Brady can throw deep but he isn't really a cannon arm QB at age 43...
.
And likewise, I think it's equally ridiculous to keep seeing those same objections on almost every page by the same posters 94 pages in. Isn't it clear where the mods stand on this by now? Isn't it equally clear where other posters stand on it? Get over the fact that there are posters on the board still very interested in following Brady's career and the mods think enough of the subject matter to allow it on the main board. At this point let's just super simplify it... stay if you're interested, leave and stay gone if you're not. Done.The reasons have been stated repeatedly. You can disagree with them if you like, but it's ridiculous to assert you can't imagine why someone would object to discussing players who are not New England Patriots in a New England Patriots forum.
No, it didn't. That's just what you all are trying to say now because all other arguments have failed. The thread title is clear. I posted what information I could find at the time during the dead spot of the off season. The roster and some of the other stuff I felt were relevant because they impact Brady obviously; Brady and Gronk are both part of the 53 last I checked. As more information specific to Brady became obtainable, I posted it and continue to do so. As information not specifically about Brady but still relevant to him, like one of his primary offensive weapons missing time for example, becomes available, I'll post it as well. Does the overall record not have something to do with Brady and Gronk? As for other things, I cannot control if other people post other sorts of things about the Bucs.This thread began discussing players on the Bucs not named Tom or Gronk long before that poster made a few tongue-in-cheek posts.
And actually, your first sentence isn't really right. His issue isn't having a thread about Tom and Gronk, quite the contrary; his issue is having a thread (in the Patriots-specific subforum) discussing Bucs players not named Tom or Gronk.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











