Coronavirus RESPECTFUL Discussion Only! (Mod edit: Closed)

[patsfan13]

It's funny that you appear to actually believe this stuff. The difference is who is in the White House now versus then, nothing more, nothing less.

Mindless blather and projection are usual.

 

[patsfan13]

Please tell me how much money is actually going to small business and individuals.

I don't knwo the details, you?

I do know in 2009 small businesses got zip, people got zip, banks fot the trillions. Banks caused the problems in the Housing crisis. No one invented the corona virus.

Apples and oranges.

 

[PatriotsReign]

This is not the time to allow ourselves to bear the pain of the world. Save it for those you you know & love.

I’m learning there is so much I’ve taken for granted in my life. God willing I’m still here when this is over, I pray I never forget these things.

I have no reason to be angry today so I choose to be grateful

 

[RobertWeathers]

I don't knwo the details, you?

I do know in 2009 small businesses got zip, people got zip, banks fot the trillions. Banks caused the problems in the Housing crisis. No one invented the corona virus.

Apples and oranges.

According to CNN...

$250 billion set aside for direct payments to individuals and families, $350 billion in small business loans, $250 billion in unemployment insurance benefits and $500 billion in loans for distressed companies.

Under the plan as it was being negotiated, individuals who earn $75,000 in adjusted gross income or less would get direct payments of $1,200 each, with married couples earning up to $150,000 receiving $2,400 -- and an additional $500 per each child. The payment would scale down by income, phasing out entirely at $99,000 for singles and $198,000 for couples without children.

In addition, the bill would provide a major amount of funding for hard-hit hospitals -- $130 billion -- as well as $150 billion for state and local governments that are cash-strapped due to their response to combat coronavirus.

Stimulus package: White House, Senate reach historic $2 trillion deal amid growing coronavirus fears - CNNPolitics

 

[JackBauer]

I don't knwo the details, you?

I do know in 2009 small businesses got zip, people got zip, banks fot the trillions. Banks caused the problems in the Housing crisis. No one invented the corona virus.

Apples and oranges.

Mindless blather and projection are usual.

Some things never change. With you, it's not having a single clue what you're talking about.

Feel free to support any of your assertions regarding the 2009 stimulus.

 

[Adam Seward]

Some things never change. With you, it's not having a single clue what you're talking about.

Feel free to support any of your assertions regarding the 2009 stimulus.

He goes full McNamara and answers the question he wished youd asked. But that might be a little insulting to McNamara because I think Robbie at least had a comprehension of what he was dodging.

 

[1960Pats]

It’s certainly interesting. Seeing the same group of people that so fervently objected in the past to politicians that had marital indiscretions currently supporting someone with such a checkered past is a study in how power can shift a moral compass.

Stop switching the topic to Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures.

 

[JackBauer]

According to CNN...

Stimulus package: White House, Senate reach historic $2 trillion deal amid growing coronavirus fears - CNNPolitics

I don't like Chuck but he deserves credit for this:

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer secured an agreement in the $2 trillion federal coronavirus stimulus package that would bar businesses owned by President Donald Trump, his family, top US officials, and members of Congress from receiving money from the fund.

An aide to Schumer told Reuters that under the proviso, businesses owned by Vice President Mike Pence and heads of executive-branch departments would also be barred from receiving loans or investments under the Treasury Department programs.

The Senate and the White House early on Wednesday agreed on the massive stimulus package to help American workers and businesses mitigate the devastating economic effects of the coronavirus outbreak.

Chuck Schumer made sure businesses controlled by Trump, his family, and top US officials couldn't get money from the government's $2 trillion coronavirus bailout fund

 

[SHOWTIME15]

I don't like Chuck but he deserves credit for this:



Chuck Schumer made sure businesses controlled by Trump, his family, and top US officials couldn't get money from the government's $2 trillion coronavirus bailout fund

Well, I'm glad he wasn't pushing for funds for the Green New Deal...

 

[catent]

Without jumping too far into the political pool, the overall theme I've observed in this thread at a macro level is:

Conservatives generally dislike liberals.
Liberals generally dislike Trump.

To me, that's a very important distinction.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Does anyone know if there’s certainty regarding immunity/reinfection with Coronavirus? Google didn’t help that much. I saw some blurbs that people are getting it a second time even worse, but I suspect scientists aren’t jumping aboard that one.

 

[patman12]

Stop switching the topic to Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures.

The f

Stop switching the topic to Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures.

Or, you know, you could just recognize the shift in behavior and realize how disingenuous evangelical leadership has become.

 

[venecol]

Deal done. I'm getting $1,200

Can't wait to order these bad boyz

View attachment 26539

Damn it. Checks not arriving until May. I hope they don't run out by then. I'm worried.

 

[primetime]

Does anyone know if there’s certainty regarding immunity/reinfection with Coronavirus? Google didn’t help that much. I saw some blurbs that people are getting it a second time even worse, but I suspect scientists aren’t jumping aboard that one.

There aren't serological tests available so it's hard to tell if those anecdotal 'recurring' cases are actual recurrences or if people were just released before the virus had been expelled from their systems. Other coronaviruses generally confer some degree of immunity for a time depending on the strain. There was a report that this strain is not mutating very much, which is good news for antibodies and the potential for a long-term vaccine.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Without jumping too far into the political pool, the overall theme I've observed in this thread at a macro level is:

Conservatives generally dislike liberals.
Liberals generally dislike Trump.

To me, that's a very important distinction.

Most posters in this thread are a moderates and very few are dyed-in-the-wool conservatives or liberals, despite having some pull in one direction. A lot of posters here are centrists who don’t like Trump or conservatives who are pretty balanced about Trump.

Then there are a few pretty staunch conservatives/Trumpers and I suspect a few hardcore liberals who claim they’re in the middle but aren’t.

Oh, and @primetime , the Mao worshipping, Stalin fan club leading, Animal Farm pig championing COMMIE

 

[Adam Seward]

Does anyone know if there’s certainty regarding immunity/reinfection with Coronavirus? Google didn’t help that much. I saw some blurbs that people are getting it a second time even worse, but I suspect scientists aren’t jumping aboard that one.

There was a lot of talk about it in China when this first kicked off, however many were dying from a second bout of pneumonia from compromised immune systems and lung damage due to Covid19. If I can pull anything up from an article or journal Ill link it.

 

[SHOWTIME15]

Without jumping too far into the political pool, the overall theme I've observed in this thread at a macro level is:

Conservatives generally dislike liberals.
Liberals generally dislike Trump.

To me, that's a very important distinction.

Well, that's easy for you considering Trump is in office. There is no one liberal for conservatives to attack these days. If I bring up Obama, it's off topic. And humor me and name me one conservative (not Trump) you actually like.

 

[patman12]

Does anyone know if there’s certainty regarding immunity/reinfection with Coronavirus? Google didn’t help that much. I saw some blurbs that people are getting it a second time even worse, but I suspect scientists aren’t jumping aboard that one.

Still too early to tell. In theory, those infected should be immune from reinfection after recovery. That assumes the virus doesn’t mutate, which, to the best of my knowledge, is the unknown.

 

[catent]

It wasn't the government that was turning a blind eye eye towards slavery. It was, and always has been, the democrats.

That's getting off topic though. Carry on.

It's been said again, and again, and again ....

and again.

But it must be said ... again:

Attempting to draw an equivalence or parallel between the Democratic party of the 19th century and the Democratic party of the 21st century, is impossible. Ditto for the Republican party. Politics have changed since then and the party platforms have changed.

Here's an example: neither party openly supports slavery anymore.

So perhaps it's best to not imply (if not outright explicitly state) that democrats today still 'turn a blind eye' towards slavery.

Yeah, this is a COVID thread, but if you're going to initiate the off-topic stuff with such an outrageous claim, it needs to be addressed.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

It's been said again, and again, and again ....

and again.

But it must be said ... again:

Attempting to draw an equivalence or parallel between the Democratic party of the 19th century and the Democratic party of the 21st century, is impossible. Ditto for the Republican party. Politics have changed since then and the party platforms have changed.

Here's an example: neither party openly supports slavery anymore.

So perhaps it's best to not imply (if not outright explicitly state) that democrats today still 'turn a blind eye' towards slavery.

Yeah, this is a COVID thread, but if you're going to initiate the off-topic stuff with such an outrageous claim, it needs to be countered.

The Democratic-Republican party was formed by Jefferson and Madison, who are the forebears to the modern day Republican Party.

They championed states rights, a small federal government, and were largely interested in the South’s well being (hence they supported slavery.)

To try to trace a party back due to its name is ludicrous. The Dems and Reps flip flopped in the mid 20th century...evidence is in the voting patterns of southern states.