- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 73,419
- Reaction score
- 116,130
This protest line (now with a story on Brady possibly not returning) just seems off. If Brady and Gronk want Belichick gone, then it seems an odd play as neither may be long for the NFL and coaches (even older coaches) can last much longer. Kraft brought in Belichick (not Brady) to fix the Pats. It would seem to be a weird power play to ask Kraft to choose one over the other, if that is what this is at all.
Brady has missed offseason workouts previously (2010 for example). He is image and legacy conscious, and leading a mutiny, especially if it is successful and the team were to be less successful without Belichick, would be a significant black mark on his career. I could see he and Gronk skipping voluntary workouts if they are in a divide over Guerrero methods vs. team trainer.
As Brady has played the statesman in his career, I see him calling it a day in a formal conference when done and leaving as he has played. With storylines going from February contract holdouts unless he got a new deal to Guerrero and now to he may not return in 2018, the melodrama just isn't entertaining. I will care when either Gronk or Brady actually say something that offers more than tea leaves on how 2018 might play out, or the Pats announce either or both are being placed on the retired list and off the roster.
Agree 100%
Bill is not going anywhere. As much a Krafty plays up Tom for the fans, the team is for Bill to run. I also think the Tom OR Bill storyline is BS.
Yea I'm stopping short of saying there is a revolt but due to an accumulation of things (Guerrero, contract $, weary of the grind playing for this org) I do think there is some weirdness going on with Gronk & Tom. Both are at inflection points in their respective careers.
I know Tom missed in 2010. I don't mean to overblow his absence. I do think he is doing his best to balance family, TB12 brand promotion and being QB for the NEP. He'll be back soon enough.












