Dion Lewis will be the starter and feature back come opening night - just like he has been every game as a Patriot when he hasn't been snap-limited.
Dion Lewis is not a 'Third Down Back". Dion Lewis is RB1, and he's never NOT been RB1, unless recovering from an injury.
I don't know that anyone should necessarily consider him
just a 3rd down back, but it's getting to be an awfully crowded backfield these days. Here are a few things to note from your post:
--He's been playing in the NFL since 2011, and yet he's never topped more than 283 yards rushing in a season. That's certainly interesting, considering that you claim that "he's a #1, and he's never not been a #1."
--In the past 5 years, he's never played more than half a season. Do you find that troubling at all, considering his extensive injury history?
--How would you explain Belichick's decision to take on expensive cap hits for both Gilleslee (4m) and Burkhead (3.15m) while also extending James White a year early, who just so happens to be our SB hero, while Lewis watched from the bench? Are you really going to suggest that none of this is going to change the status of Lewis as our "#1 back," particularly with even more pieces added?
--If your theory is true that he's always been our number one RB, how do you explain his 12 measly snaps in the season's most important game versus ATL in the SB? In comparison, White saw 71 snaps. Actually, both White and Blount saw more reps than Lewis in the AFCCG and SB. Lewis only had 12 in the SB and 17 the week before. Hardly sounds like a clear cut RB1 to me, considering that he saw the third most reps for RBs in the two biggest games of the year. Considering that new additions have been added to create even more competition and flexibility, I'm not as sure as you are that Lewis will be as clear of a RB1 as you're suggesting. Ultimately, I hope that you're right, as I like the kid and he seems to be a good luck charm.