Perfect actor to portray Goodell

[Schmo]

You're now babbling nonsense. Congratulations.

Sorry if I'm going over your head.

 

[Deus Irae]

Sorry if I'm going over your head.

That day's never come. I doubt it ever will. Comments like the above, and the mirror comment, show the evil and hypocrisy of the P.C. crew, though, so feel free to keep proving my point for me.

 

[Joker]

He's best represented by a CGI'ed talking butt plug.

 

[Schmo]

That day's never come. I doubt it ever will.

I'll say this, your confidence is pretty impressive. I have yet to hear any reasoning from you besides, "PC is intimidation.... because it is," or, "what you say is nonsense... because I say so." If you have a way of convincing me that what you believe is a valid opinion, I welcome it.... I really do.

Otherwise, I get it, you're a contrarian. Congratulations.

 

[Tony2046]

In order to have sound logic, you have to start with correct assumptions. To say that I'm "intimidating" anyone with the reasoning I've given you is pretty far fetched. I'm simply calling people out on saying things that would get them punched in the mouth by people (if those people were able to defend themselves).

I can't help it if you think mirrors are ugly.

So calling someone a C**t won't get you punched in the mouth?

I use the word c**t (as well as others) on a fairly regular basis.

 

[A Defiant Goose]

 

[NashuaPats]

I don't like how this word has essentially been banned. It actually has a valid defintition: characterized by a slowness or limitation in intellectual understanding and awareness, emotional development, academic progress, etc. I totally understand why it shouldn't be used towards people with mental handicaps. But I don't feel it should not be allowed when expressing one's anger towards someone who is being obnoxiously and offensively dumb like Roger Goodell. Sure, it's a mean thing to say about people with challenges, but I want to say mean things about someone like Goodell because he does act like someone who has a limitation in intellectual understanding and awareness, emotional development, academic progress, etc. There is no word that captures that as well. Idiot, moron, imbecile, etc. does not quite cut it and certainly doesn't capture the frustration and anger towards him. Should I call Goodell mentally handicapped? Isn't that even more offensive since that is the politically correct word for people we don't want to offend? There really is no better word to express one's feelings toward someone whose intellect your angry about such as him. Still, I refrain from using that word, but it kind of leaves me unfulfilled kind of like saying darn or shoot because there are kids around when you really want to yell **** or fuk.

 

[Deus Irae]

I'll say this, your confidence is pretty impressive.

As is your hypocrisy. Now, are you done making yourself look like a fool, or do you feel the need to continue?

I have yet to hear any reasoning from you besides, "PC is intimidation.... because it is," or, "what you say is nonsense... because I say so." If you have a way of convincing me that what you believe is a valid opinion, I welcome it.... I really do.

You've offered nothing that remotely approaches a logical reason to ban the word ******.

Otherwise, I get it, you're a contrarian. Congratulations.

My anti-PC stance has been spoken of, and demonstrated, multiple times on this site. My posts in this thread have nothing to do with being a contrarian. That's at least the 3rd time you've attempted to insult or 'other' me, by the way.

You, meanwhile, claim that you are fine with the "c" word, but haven't yet shut up about the "r" word. If you can't see the hypocrisy there, never mind with regards to the personal shots you sent in my direction, then you've got some real issues that need to be worked on, and that "mirror" you mentioned is one you should sit your ass down in front of, for a good, long, introspective look.

 

[Joker]

I tried to stifle myself the past few years but sudden outbursts of "you rotten ****in' cokksukker!" kept slipping out at the most inopportune times...finally, in desperation, I reached out to a medical expert who did a full workup and diagnosed me with an acute case of Tourette/Goodelian Syndrome..or T/GS.

At present there is no known cure, no any effective medicines yet developed to treat this malady. I just hope and pray for a remedy soon, so that I can get my life as a normal person back.

 

[Schmo]

So calling someone a C**t won't get you punched in the mouth?

Who says I call people that? It's a term refering to anatomy, so no, not necessarily. Maybe it's the way I use it. I don't casually throw it around in public either. That's just a matter of tact.

It's definitely not the same as encapsulating someone's life struggle into a single demeaning term. Like I said, just like the words n****r and f****t. I think there's a HUGE difference between the two kinds of uses, and why I don't exactly consider myself PC.

 

[Schmo]

As is your hypocrisy. Now, are you done making yourself look like a fool, or do you feel the need to continue?



You've offered nothing that remotely approaches a logical reason to ban the word ******.



My anti-PC stance has been spoken of, and demonstrated, multiple times on this site. My posts in this thread have nothing to do with being a contrarian. That's at least the 3rd time you've attempted to insult or 'other' me, by the way.

You, meanwhile, claim that you are fine with the "c" word, but haven't yet shut up about the "r" word. If you can't see the hypocrisy there, never mind with regards to the personal shots you sent in my direction, then you've got some real issues that need to be worked on, and that "mirror" you mentioned is one you should sit your ass down in front of, for a good, long, introspective look.

It's the difference between tolerating "dirty/banned" language and tolerating hate. If you think the former justifies the latter, and is a sign of hypocrisy, I don't think I'll be able to reason with you (guessing that's the case anyway).

I don't mind taking your personal shots for what I believe, and I definitely won't classify your attacks as "evil." That's just ridiculous. I think I have voiced my (very valid) opinion.

 

[ThatllMoveTheChains!!!]

Who says I call people that? It's a term refering to anatomy, so no, not necessarily. Maybe it's the way I use it. I don't casually throw it around in public either. That's just a matter of tact.

It's definitely not the same as encapsulating someone's life struggle into a single demeaning term. Like I said, just like the words n****r and f****t. I think there's a HUGE difference between the two kinds of uses, and why I don't exactly consider myself PC.

Some of us will consider moving on from hate words to correctly applying an adjective too far.

It's funny that people made it about the word when their issue is the usage. Whether one says ******ed or mentally handicapped it's equally demeaning when someone is applying the term to an able minded person.

Either way it isn't an insult to those afflicted, but to the able minded person. Just like it isn't an insult to handicapped people to tell someone whose obese to stop acting handicapped.

Back on topic.

 

[Deus Irae]

It's the difference between tolerating "dirty/banned" language and tolerating hate. If you think the former justifies the latter, and is a sign of hypocrisy, I don't think I'll be able to reason with you (guessing that's the case anyway).

I don't mind taking your personal shots for what I believe, and I think I have voiced my (very valid) opinion.

You've spoken nonsense and made a complete ass of yourself, and you've done it while attacking someone with a family member who is both autistic and ******ed. Your opinion was noted earlier. Your opinion is noted now. Laisse tomber.

 

[Tony2046]

Who says I call people that? It's a term refering to anatomy, so no, not necessarily. Maybe it's the way I use it. I don't casually throw it around in public either. That's just a matter of tact.

It's definitely not the same as encapsulating someone's life struggle into a single demeaning term. Like I said, just like the words n****r and f****t. I think there's a HUGE difference between the two kinds of uses, and why I don't exactly consider myself PC.

I took the OP's post at face value. He was insulting Roger Goodell.

 

[Schmo]

You've spoken nonsense and made a complete ass of yourself, and you've done it while attacking someone with a family member who is both autistic and ******ed. Your opinion was noted earlier. Your opinion is noted now. Laisse tomber.

I agree with almost every single word..... only from me to you. What were you saying about hypocrisy?

Thanks for the conversation.

 

[YOUGOTMOSSED]

I'll have to say that you are completely wrong. It's an inconvenience to some, not the downfall of our country.... in a lot of cases, a simple display of tact and empathy. You can go ahead and take the "if you disapprove of what I say, I disapprove of what you say" stance while sticking your tongue out at me, but fact is, using certain terms promotes hate.

Bullsh*t! It stifles meaningful discussion. It silences hard truths that may hurt somebody's weedle fweelings. It marginalizes people brave enough to address real problems. I ascribe the "PC culture" as being 99.9% of the reason why we've become so degenerate as a society.

 

[Deus Irae]

I agree with every single word..... only from me to you. What were you saying about hypocrisy?

I was saying you're a hypocrite. Now, let it drop.

 

[Schmo]

I was saying you're a hypocrite. Now, let it drop.

Back at ya bud. Good night.

 

[OhExaulted1]

Your opinion is noted. I disagree with your statement. I consider political correctness to be an evil, and the people who try to impose it on us to be malevolent fools. You can now go try intimidating others. That crap doesn't work on me.

Now youre targeting malevolent fools.

Your social insensitivity knows no bounds.

 

[Joseph K. Brady]

Sean Penn. He is almost universally hated, identifies well with dictators and has already proven that he can go full ****** in "I Am Sam".