Yes, I can see that. But is this a bad thing? It can be, if the passes are on target, no doubt. But with KT here, and analyzing the overall play; jam, buildup, read, route and outcome, I still think these double clutches are overall a good play from the wideout. From the rose view, we saw a rookie player that fought and got open (on a regular basis no less), sometimes even making it look easy, make good reads, then for whatever reasons (inexperience, exuberance, poor TB deliveries, chemistry, etc - and the true debate of how much and where he might improve IMO), whatever reasons, he often found a ball delivered slightly off target or off-timed from what the he expected when he made his turn. Not crazy off target, cuz his reads were good, but off by 1,2 or 3 feet from his hands. Now stay with me. Here is where the possible dual view of the double clutch comes in: Why it's good view. KT wouldn't blink, he'd react, stretch out, extend, jump, whatever it took and CATCH the ball. Yes he'd often double clutch it. That's what usually happens when you catch a poorly thrown ball, and your body is out of position, and you need to pull everything back together, and sprint for your life. Just get it done. Now, why it's not worse view. We've all seen dozens of receivers (mostly other teams thankfully) NOT CATCH a similar pass at all. They just couldn't adjust to ball quickly enough, might alligator arm it, get bumped off the spot while they waited, simply were out jumped, see it scoot thru their fingers, turn upfield too soon leaving it behind, hell, I've even seen them bounce straight off stone hands into perfect running knee drop kicks to land 25 yds deep into incredulous NYJ partisan crowds
But the one thing these guys never got accused of was double-clutching a catch. They just straight out dropped it. So a double-clutch CATCH could be looked at as good overall too I argue.
