- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,772
- Reaction score
- 22,604
Where in the base do you project him? On the outside or creating controversy on the inside and many "trade spikes" threads on pats fans.com
OLB. Thats his best spot.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Where in the base do you project him? On the outside or creating controversy on the inside and many "trade spikes" threads on pats fans.com
The Patriots drafted a position in dire need. Whilst I'm not overly thrilled, I don't know enough about Wilson to make an informed comment on the decision. I'll be interested to hear BB's press conference.
and Marcus Harrison . .
The second round picks are graded at nfl.com, and it's instructive to see TAYvon's rating of 48. The picks before and after are in the 84 range.
They certainly aren't sold on this tremendous reach. Maybe the scouting dept. of the Patriots has unearthed a guy absolutely no one else could see.
Unlikely but possible.
This is the 48th player taken? A guy who the coaches in his own league don't award as even an honorary all big ten player, even though he had been a long-time starter? things aren't adding up here.
The arrogance of Belichick is really coming through.
Hey, did you miss the Jarvis Green reference?
The funny thing is I actually noticed that and tried to come up with a good non-white comp for Bequette! I wanted a big, sturdily built DE who isn't a super fast or fluid athlete but succeeds with power and play recognition. Who am I missing?
If you glean any insight from that, please let us know.
"Uh ... well ... showed good leadership and performed competitively against the opposition in a strong conference ... Was a team captain ... Is smart and versatile ... Was the best player at that spot which we felt can help our football team ... We had him rated highly regardless of what the other "experts" might think ... :blahblah: :yawn2: ... "
OLB. Thats his best spot.
I got out of BB what I was hoping for; "he has some versatility".If you glean any insight from that, please let us know.
"Uh ... well ... showed good leadership and performed competitively against the opposition in a strong conference ... Was a team captain ... Is smart and versatile ... Was the best player at that spot which we felt can help our football team ... We had him rated highly regardless of what the other "experts" might think ... :blahblah: :yawn2: ... "
Yea me too, there are questions about his agility and ability to change direction out there however.
Best thing about this process is, we always find out sooner or later who the real players are regardless of the endless analysis.
Joe Adams is still available at WR...Doubt he will be available for us in the 5th though.
Seems to be a lot of that going around tonight.
Deaderick and Fanene are LDEs in the 43.
The DTs are
Wilfork = stud
Love = shouldn't be a starter
Pryor = can't get on the field, or do anything when he does
Brace = total enigma who could be gone
It doesnt get any thinner.
I am totally confused over this Travin Wilson draft pick.
Why in the world did we feel we needed to draft him #45.
If they wanted him, he would have probably been available in the
5th round.
There have been 5 safteys drafted so far.
Mark Baron drafted #7 had a ESPN Scouts rating of 95
Harrison Smith drafted #29 had a ESPN Scouts rating of 89
Travon Wilson drafted #45 had a ESPN scouts rating of 32
Brandon Taylor drafted #73 had a ESPN Scouts rating of 78
Brandon Harden drafted #79 had a ESPN Scouts rating of 62
I have to say, while I'm O.K. with this pick and the first two, the Travon Wilson pick is so horrible, it ruined this draft for me. I keep reading, 'trust BB, he knows DBs better than us', but his history on drafting DBs actually makes me feel it's less likely that he knows more than everybody else in drafting Wilson. I'm also reading 'how do you know there were any takers to trade back with that pick', but if GB took our later 2nd Rd pick for a 3rd and a 5th, they would have taken this one for it. I'd have rather gotten two picks for the first 2nd Rd pick, and BB could have very likely drafted this undrafted free agent type safety in the 3rd Round, and still have had the second 2nd round pick.
Sorry to look at the glass as half empty, but you draft a 2nd Round pick in hopes of big things from the guy, and how many here can realistically say we will hit with Travon Wilson? I highly doubt it, which means BB yet again didn't hit on a 2nd Rd pick. Amazing! I'm very bummed, and again should be feeling good about adding 4 defensive players. It could be a very good draft, but it could have been absolutely great, and it won't be now.
Final Point: I've seen several comments online that, 'well they hit on Mankins and Vollmer when most didn't agree with the picks. The difference to me is after those picks we all did some digging and it gave us alot to be happy and hopeful about. I'm trying to dig on this guy and keep finding empty pages. Really Bill, you honestly couldn't take a chance on getting some value picks and getting this guy later? Is he really such a can't miss, that you HAD to draft him this high in the 2nd round?
| 39 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 23 - June 7 (Through 26yrs)










