- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
Re: Pats release Levoir
The problem was that you didn't bother to read it. Ken conceded my point, albeit doing so by claiming that there was no way to get an adequate replacement, apparently confusing "adequate" with "just as good".
For most of the rest of his post, he was arguing something I wasn't getting into, because it wasn't relevant to the point about having adequate replacements, and it's something that's been gone over time and again.
Again, if you hadn't been so keen on trying to get a dig in at me, perhaps your reading comprehension wouldn't have failed you.
Read it again, because you obviously miscomprehended.
I never said that one was right and the other was wrong. Please show me where I did.
I said that one broached the subject, and when the other responded with reason and rational, the first wrote that he didn't want to talk about it. It's hilarious to bring up a subject and then say 'I don't want to talk about it'.
It is what it is.
The problem was that you didn't bother to read it. Ken conceded my point, albeit doing so by claiming that there was no way to get an adequate replacement, apparently confusing "adequate" with "just as good".
For most of the rest of his post, he was arguing something I wasn't getting into, because it wasn't relevant to the point about having adequate replacements, and it's something that's been gone over time and again.
Again, if you hadn't been so keen on trying to get a dig in at me, perhaps your reading comprehension wouldn't have failed you.
Last edited:












