- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 2,886
- Reaction score
- 1,506
For those claiming different coordinators would command different results, I pose these questions: do any one of you know exactly what past coordinators did in comparison to present coordinators? Did you sit in the meeting rooms and planning rooms and bask in the warmth of the glow of those coordinators and realize they could out-plan anyone in the NFL using a mere deli platter for personnel?
I expect to you McDaniels was worse than Weis and you grumbled over his competency, even as the team broke every offensive record in the book in 2007. Even as McDaniels currently seems to be doing fairly well with a bunch of his own no-names in Denver.
Brady made two bad throws last night. Two bad throws was about all it took to bury the team in a shootout. Weis would not throw the ball for him, so I don't see how he would help last night. The defense has less experience than it did in previous years, and obviously you enjoyed a positive learning experience last night. Crennell does not play defensive back, and no receiver should ever be as open as one was on the 75 yard TD last night. There is no defensive scheme that can be called to correct that. That's called execution, offensive and defensive, and that is on the players.
The NFL has evolved since 2004. Check the rules, check the teams and check the players. If Romeo is such a defensive genius, explain Cleveland and that team's defense. If Weis is the Einstein of offenses, explain Notre Dame and that team's offense relative to the NCAA powerhouses. Or maybe it is wizardry and they magically become exponentially more intelligent when they return to the sideline with the Pats, and the 2003-2004 defensive personnel return in exactly the same condition they were in those years, and Corey Dillon returns as well, and Brady's knee injury and lost season dissolve into the mist and all is well once more in New England. Frankly, I just cannot understand this fascination with past coordinators when I suspect few know exactly what success is attributable to them, and what is attributable to personnel and the current organization.
I expect to you McDaniels was worse than Weis and you grumbled over his competency, even as the team broke every offensive record in the book in 2007. Even as McDaniels currently seems to be doing fairly well with a bunch of his own no-names in Denver.
Brady made two bad throws last night. Two bad throws was about all it took to bury the team in a shootout. Weis would not throw the ball for him, so I don't see how he would help last night. The defense has less experience than it did in previous years, and obviously you enjoyed a positive learning experience last night. Crennell does not play defensive back, and no receiver should ever be as open as one was on the 75 yard TD last night. There is no defensive scheme that can be called to correct that. That's called execution, offensive and defensive, and that is on the players.
The NFL has evolved since 2004. Check the rules, check the teams and check the players. If Romeo is such a defensive genius, explain Cleveland and that team's defense. If Weis is the Einstein of offenses, explain Notre Dame and that team's offense relative to the NCAA powerhouses. Or maybe it is wizardry and they magically become exponentially more intelligent when they return to the sideline with the Pats, and the 2003-2004 defensive personnel return in exactly the same condition they were in those years, and Corey Dillon returns as well, and Brady's knee injury and lost season dissolve into the mist and all is well once more in New England. Frankly, I just cannot understand this fascination with past coordinators when I suspect few know exactly what success is attributable to them, and what is attributable to personnel and the current organization.
Last edited: