We're on to the Giants

[Clonamery]

Funny how folks that claim to have others on ignore respond to their posts but it is good to see them get out of their safe spaces once in a while.

Your “attention whore” post brought him right out of the closet.

 

[maust]

Hmmm...

Fact 1: You've been here since 2018 with 6000 or so posts.
Fact 2: I've been here since 2005 with 6000 or so posts. So you're outposting me at a yearly rate of 7:1-ish.
Fact 3: I'm not thread-policing your threads.
Fact 4: You're thread-policing mine... embedding a link to yours.

Fact: I've never denied being a post whore

 

[maust]

Your “attention whore” post brought him right out of the closet.

I've always held to the theory that anyone who goes through the public histrionics of announcing they are putting someone on ignore is probably to paranoid to leave them there. Except maybe for Andy, he's just afraid he'll miss out on an argument

 

[oldrover]

Your “attention whore” post brought him right out of the closet.

LOL... I don't have maust (or anyone) on ignore. And if I were an attention whore I would post WAY more. Especially polls.

Truth be told, because I am a fan who is not anywhere NEAR as knowledgeable about the game as most folks in the forum, I see my contributing role as...

 

[Wax Frog]

Truth be told, because I am a fan who is not anywhere NEAR as knowledgeable about the game as most folks in the forum, I see my contributing role as...

Does that make me Usefulrover?

 

[Mack Herron]

The inactive list is populating.

 

[Urgent]

The inactive list is populating.

Not quite to the level of an unfair disadvantage.

 

[Boston Boxer]

i predict Meyers will have a big game

 

[SBLIII]

The inactive list is populating.

won't even need him going forward if Michel is starting to be a factor in the pass game.

On the other hand, Chung will be back tonight.

 

[Sicilian]

won't even need him going forward if Michel is starting to be a factor in the pass game.

On the other hand, Chung will be back tonight.

I'd always rather have Chung than not, but do we know this? If he's questionable, I might hold him out simply because there's no one on the Giants I feel we need him to cover. He typically helps most on tight ends and running backs, and the Giants are without their top three.

 

[Uptown]

 

[Mack Herron]

I'd always rather have Chung than not, but do we know this? If he's questionable, I might hold him out simply because there's no one on the Giants I feel we need him to cover. He typically helps most on tight ends and running backs, and the Giants are without their top three.

 

[fxmallon]

One reason why Barkley is not playing tonight is because the Giants have two winnable games coming up, and they want him to be 100% for them. If the Giants had won this last Sunday, he would be playing tonight in an attempt to keep that 3-2 record momentum going. So, they're kind of waving the white flag on tonite's contest.

 

[Clonamery]

LOL... I don't have maust (or anyone) on ignore. And if I were an attention whore I would post WAY more. Especially polls.

Truth be told, because I am a fan who is not anywhere NEAR as knowledgeable about the game as most folks in the forum, I see my contributing role as...

Howdy partner. @oldrover that was not aimed at you.

 

[RobertWeathers]

One reason why Barkley is not playing tonight is because the Giants have two winnable games coming up, and they want him to be 100% for them. If the Giants had won this last Sunday, he would be playing tonight in an attempt to keep that 3-2 record momentum going. So, they're kind of waving the white flag on tonite's contest.

That too.

Had a bad ankle injury. 1st game back on slick, wet turf isn't optimal either.

 

[Froob]

I suppose the Giants will be feeling more David than Goliath, tonight?

 

[Sicilian]

I'm using that Favre fact as an excuse to bring up my second favorite Jets stillshot of all time:

 

[DaBronxPats14]

STOMP'm! Get an Injury Free "W"

 

[Uptown]

 

[Uptown]