- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 17,558
- Reaction score
- 17,173
I don't even think it would need to be incentive laden. Close to minimum and no guarantees and it's worth a camp look.On an incentive heavy deal? Do it.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't even think it would need to be incentive laden. Close to minimum and no guarantees and it's worth a camp look.On an incentive heavy deal? Do it.
WTF. Hes not dead. lol
Like madness in the spring. HEYO, deep cut.Can Flowers bloom in New England again?
3.5 sacks in 18 games (basically a full season) isn’t bad for a guy you’re signing to be a depth piece. Lower risk of injury if he’s not seeing more than 10 snaps a game. And even if he gets hurt anyway - well, you didn’t spend much money on him probably. Has to be a minimum deal with maybe some decent incentives if he somehow manages to play 50% of the snaps or something like that.It feels mean, but is he even worth the James Ferentz or Carl Davis contract at this point? They have at least been available to play when called upon. Flowers has missed 32 games in the last 3 seasons, with only 3.5 sacks in the 18 games that he did play.
Why did we not sign Clelin Ferrell? Low risk high reward ... 49ers have signed him and Hargreaves. Their defense will be otherworldly...
Not too enthused with flowers now...
It feels mean, but is he even worth the James Ferentz or Carl Davis contract at this point? They have at least been available to play when called upon. Flowers has missed 32 games in the last 3 seasons, with only 3.5 sacks in the 18 games that he did play.
I hear Ty Warren is available
Agreed. Sign him to a camp deal and hope you get a semi productive year out of him. If not cut him.On an incentive heavy deal? Do it.