patsfanfromoversea
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 5,540
- Reaction score
- 7,193
WaddleWaddle or trade down?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.WaddleWaddle or trade down?
I can imagine that scenario as wellIf Mac Jones is there at 15, Bill is taking him.
I just think we’ve seen what it’s like to not have a capable QB. Better to have too many.I can imagine that scenario as well
I’d love to see our board.If Mac Jones is there at 15, Bill is taking him.
Agree but have hope for CamI just think we’ve seen what it’s like to not have a capable QB.
I don't pick Jones just bc we need a qb. I only select him if we think he can be a legit starter if not trade downBetter to have too many.
True I am not sure if I would prefer darnold or jimmy gWe also need to adopt the possibility of a trade for Darnold, remember we have his QB coach and Bill has spoken highly of him as has other talking heads in the NFL. He was a second overall pick.
I think our second could get it done. With a new offense and head coach and culture in place in NYJ they will Let Wilson sink or swim right alway.
If Jones isn’t a legitimate starter, we have to move up to 4.Agree but have hope for Cam
I don't pick Jones just bc we need a qb. I only select him if we think he can be a legit starter if not trade down
If Jones isn’t a legitimate starter, we have to move up to 4
Why would you have them trade down ? This is the perfect draft to trade UP ! They have the draft capital (10 picks) and not many holes to fill. Last thing they need is MORE picks acquired by trading down. #15 overall is a prime slot, take the available players at 15.Waddle or trade down?
If it costs them 15 and two future firsts, no f*cking way. You give that up for a sure thing like Watson (pre allegations). In my opinion, San Francisco was crazy to give up that much draft capital for one of three boom or bust prospects.If Jones isn’t a legitimate starter, we have to move up to 4.
I’d take Waddle without hesitation, now you’ve got a dynamic WR1 everyone was hoping for, on a rookie contract for the next 4-5 years. BB has never drafted a WR that high, so it would definitely be different.Waddle or trade down?
We have no quarterback. Which means we’re right back here next year: bad enough to not win it all a d good enough that our first round picks are never high enough.If it costs them 15 and two future firsts, no f*cking way. You give that up for a sure thing like Watson (pre allegations). In my opinion, San Francisco was crazy to give up that much draft capital for one of three boom or bust prospects.
We also need to adopt the possibility of a trade for Darnold, remember we have his QB coach and Bill has spoken highly of him as has other talking heads in the NFL. He was a second overall pick.
I think our second could get it done. With a new offense and head coach and culture in place in NYJ they will Let Wilson sink or swim right alway.
The other problem is that he sees ghosts. He could have a breakdown playing with KVN and High.The only problem with that is that Darnold is terrible. BB pump the tires of every opponent. If a pile of fresh dog **** was starting for the opposition, he would tell you that it smells like a lavender field.
| 9 | 615 |
| 4 | 320 |
| 8 | 551 |
| 20 | 564 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 29 - May 14 (Through 26yrs)











