Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 63,761
- Reaction score
- 14,113
He isnt a game time decision. Last nights move shows us that. If he were going to be inactive Underwood would be active.You honestly believe there is no possibility that a player who is a game time decision, will not play?
If the other set of logic is they cut Underwood because Gronk won't play, then yes my logic is the only one that fits.I didn't say this was proof of anything, other than the fact they appear to be bolstering a completely different side of the team. And that does happen quite often. Your logic is sound, but it doesn't mean it's the only one that fits.
All I'm saying is anybody on that game time decision list, is fair game to be one of the possible inactives, and yeah, personally for me, even Gronk wouldn't be a major surprise.
He is not a game time decision. We learned that last night with the move that you are saying convinced you he isn't playing.
You are adding 2+2 and gettinng 9,854.