all good and interesting talk. 2 points.
1. as the above post explained. He HAS to be on the final 53, and THEN can be put on IR, and one guy can be gotten back. The risk of course is that perhaps the player they hope to get back gets claimed on waivers. 8/31 will be an interesting day all over the league.
2. I didn't see ONE clip from the media stating that Thronton has a broken collar bone. There has been a LOT of implying that he has one, AND he very well may. BUT nothing official.
But that doesn't change the fact that he won't be around for a few weeks at least and will likely get put on IR as soon as possible
Ken, I am not an expert, but as I look around, the 8-man designated to return list keeps coming up as
this year's rule change.... and this dovetails with BB's apparent overstocking of skill positions:
You can now have up to 8 guys designated to return; it goes by how many "designations" you use, and you can do it up to twice per guy designated. All of them do have to miss 4 weeka. I might have glossed over a "1 returnee from camp" clause but I don't think so, since this all happens AFTER the 53-man cutdown.
So 8/31 will be busier than in the past, it appears.
Everybody here seems to be posting that
only 1 guy can come back. This is in the presence of a
new 8 designation world.
What I don't know is whether there is an additional 1-guy clause, or whether we are all remembering a 1-designee world, when we're now in an 8-designee world. So that's my first question, am I missing something special about 1 returnee from the IR out of the 8?
Or is that something they thought they would do but they're not doing?
"Coincidentally" we stockpiled at the mid levels (and you can hope that a Parker could have potential number 1 upside.) Then in the draft, swung for the fences. (Just at WR, which I'm focused on because of Thornton and Wilkerson).
If we are assuming 1 returnee and the rule is up to 8, that also might play (still inappropriately) into Bourne "lollygagging." It could conceivably explain why no mumbled slights of Bourne from BB. Camp, more than ever,
might be for sorting through the new influx this year. Their respective behavior, as observed, could be explained partially by this change to the environment.
I think that in addition to our 53, we should all think about who and how many go to the eligible-to-return IR.
For guys under contract, it doesn't matter... does it? You have that guy's rights whether or not he is on the 53. It's
cutting the guy that exposes him to other teams (sending a guy to the PS is just cutting him but giving him a side deal to play on the PS). But IR-ing him is not cutting him, that's why it's the IR. It just affects guys downstream.
If we want 3 designees right out of camp, for a day, we would really have 50 slots plus the 3 placeholders. It cuts into the 53 we could roster, but only for a day.
But as you point out, in this example, the 3 guys we would roster a day later are out in the cold for a day in JV Free Agency. Other teams
can make offers to our PS guys, we can make offers to theirs.
So in our hypothetical case, if we stash 3 guys on IR, we might have to compete to sign guys to the 53. If we cut Humphrey for the day, for example, to keep our 4 previous NFL-readies (including Bourne here for argument), planning to sign him on the 31st, he could be on any other team by then.
Help me out here - does being under contract
mean being on the 53, with the exception of the IR? In other words, you can't say "oh yeah if you play for anybody it'll be us but nah better luck next year, here's a million bucks to not play"... can you? I mean, obviously it's bad for the cap to do too much of that, but is that also a thing?
Then there's an eligible serving a suspension category. So maybe they should organize an end of training-camp strip club night for promising guys on the bubble.