No, it's actually the exact same thing. Starter gets hurt, back up comes in.
The difference is that when the original starter got healthy he stayed on the bench as the new backup. Hence the usage of "supplanted"
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No, it's actually the exact same thing. Starter gets hurt, back up comes in.
Brady wasn't the backup. Brady supplanted the original starter, which is different.
The difference is that when the original starter got healthy he stayed on the bench as the new backup. Hence the usage of "supplanted"
Foles played better than Brady. I know that hurts to admit, but in a shootout, Foles executed better, including catching the football.
Foles played better than Brady. I know that hurts to admit, but in a shootout, Foles executed better, including catching the football.
LOL, you can have to deal with "some shade" from whomever you wish. "...we..." don't. Enjoy yourself.They did lose to the Eagles backup QB. While we have to accept and deal with some shade from the Eagles and their fans over it the fans of 30 other teams need to answer for where their teams were on Super Bowl Sunday then STFD & STFU. When the Pats win the SB we celebrate. When they lose the fans of 31 other teams do. Think about that for a moment and you'll realize something they don't, it's the price that comes with greatness and the trolls would kill for it to be their teams that is great enough to inspire that level of insane envy and jealousy.
1 td reception (wide open)
All 2 weeks leading up to the game we all were going, myself included, “oh no way we lose to a backup, Foles was a flash in the pan, he’s gonna crap his pants.” It would be disingenuous to now go “actually he was a starting caliber QB” in order to make ourselves feel better because NONE of us believed that 8 days ago.
All 2 weeks leading up to the game we all were going, myself included, “oh no way we lose to a backup, Foles was a flash in the pan, he’s gonna crap his pants.” It would be disingenuous to now go “actually he was a starting caliber QB” in order to make ourselves feel better because NONE of us believed that 8 days ago.
Why does the media forget that "back-up QB" Nick Foles was 26-33 (78.8%) for 352 yds, 3 TDs, no INTs and a QB rating of 141.4 against the statistically best defense in the NFL during the NFC Championship game?