zoostation
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Messages
- 3,550
- Reaction score
- 2,222
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think they are comfortable with Jacoby as the backup and I think the Patriots are better with Jacoby as the backup and the picks from the trade vs having Jimmy just one more year. I would even take the Browns second and third this year for him (if that is the highest offer)
If we are going by what the Vikings did for Bradford then I say a second and fourth this year and a first next season. Or a third and fourth this year and possibly a first for next season. To me it seems a bit unrealistic, but here is why. We are basing Jimmy's performance on one and a half games. Bradford at least had a couple seasons as a starter. Now I am not saying Bradford is the better QB, however, I am a somewhat rational fan (somewhat). And putting myself in the shoes of other GM's who desperately need a QB and a few come to mind. I also have to think about the future, if I am the Browns I want my first this year. I would need my picks to build a line to protect Jimmy. Jimmy still has one year left on his rookie contract, it would be beneficial for me as a GM, I could use his performance as a future bargaining chip (or he could use it as well). however, Joe Thomas is imo, the most dominant LT in the game right now, so I would to build around to keep Jimmy (if he goes to Cleveland) clean. But we don't know how much longer Thomas will be the top at his position. However, with Cleveland having two first round picks and 2 seconds. I could wheel and deal at least one of those picks this year. I would keep the number 1 overall, because we know the Pats would just use that to get future picks.Yes, it’s another Garoppolo thread, but with a difference! For bye week fun, let’s get it on the record. Lots of back and forth here, with MOST, I think, being pretty reasonable about how much we don’t know. But there are some of the usual suspects (cough) who are stating absolutely and unequivocally what the Pats can or can not get for him.
So, eventually Garoppolo will leave, or not. If YOU were the Pats GM this year, what would you do? In this thread, say 1) whether or not you would try to trade JG this year, and 2) in the event of a trade, the MINIMUM you would accept (even if your choice would be to keep him, if someone offered their entire draft for 10 years, you’d move him.)
My personal view is that while comps can sometimes be helpful, in other ways they’re so so limited. Every guy is different. Meaning, it’s completely fair to question how much we can draw from JG’s small playing sample by pointing to other QBs who briefly flashed before burning out, but the opposite is also true—you wouldn’t have been able to cite a lot of 6th rounders who became Tom Brady.
Long way of saying, who knows. But on any trade, all it takes is ONE GM who thinks Jimmy’s the real deal, his franchise guy, to bring in a bounty.
So….if I’m GM of the Pats:
--I hold on to JG next year. This would be my first choice. I realize there’s more leverage trading him now, but I’d rather keep him for another year.
--I wouldn’t trade him for less than a first PLUS a second or third. (Note that I’m not saying the Pats would get this kind of offer, because then we’re trying to read the mind of dozens of GMs. I’m saying I wouldn’t trade him this offseason for less than that.)
If you’ve been involved in any of the other threads discussing JG, you must get on the record here. @Ian says I can ban anyone who doesn’t comply. (That last part may not be true.)
What say you??
I'm riding Brady until it's apparent he's physically incapable of playing football so given that qualification, I'd look at trading JAG for the best offer.
Absolute minimum I would take would be high #2 from Cleveland, Chicago, SF + their (presumably high) #2 next year. Two 2s, Two 3s this year and Two 2s next year. It would set us up for two years of extra picks and get a significant dividend on the original late #2 used on JG. Of course, I would try hard to get more. This is a strong year, though, for edge rushers and TE.
I meant I would take two (high) 2s for JG.I doubt we get 2 2nd rnd picks and 2 3rd rnd picks. But I would definitely take that. Those are 4 picks in the sweet spot of the draft. So if we get 2 good/great players out of the deal that would be great.
I see a lot of non-Patriots fans being appalled at a potential "Garropolo for a first round pick and more" trade. They always point to Matt Cassel, Ryan Mallett and Brian Hoyer and claim that Belichick just makes QBs look good and trading a first round pick for Garropolo is a huge mistake, etc.
I personally feel like Garropolo is way better than Cassel, Mallett and Hoyer were. The first two games where he played against Arizona and Miami were very good, almost Brady-esque. He made through his reads fast and released the ball very fast, didn't make a lot of bad throws. He is also more mobile than Brady. While his sample size is small and he isn't as good as Brady yet, I think he is already a very good QB in the NFL, and if it weren't for the fact that Brady is still playing out of his mind and doesn't seem to slow down any time soon I would have actually favored keeping Garropolo over Brady. I feel like a lot of people didn't watch the first two Patriots games and they don't realize just how good Garropolo was. Compare him to Brissett you'd see a huge difference (no hate against Brissett, he's still a rookie and obviously raw).
If I were the Patriots GM I would trade Garropolo for nothing less than a top 10 pick and a fourth round pick. I truly believe that this is a plausible trade and one of SF, Chicago and Cleveland would pull the trigger on this trade. Maybe even Arizona will make a trade with their 13th pick. The QB class this year is really lackluster and Washington will 99% keep Kirk Cousins. They don't have any options unless they decide to tank for next year's draft.