I agree with most of your post and any point of contention on my part would be nitpicking, but I think everything you've said should be taken as a warning to the seemingly unhinged American left.
I can think of no society that ever dropped the hammer on quiet homosexuality, and homosexuals had it relatively good in this country 15 years ago. Yes, people used (and continue to use) "***" as insulting slang, and they call people and things they don't like "gay," but contrary to the delusions of the diversity-police, this is not oppression.
If you can't, then you haven't been paying attention.
Now they're pushing the envelope. Gay this, gay that, gay sitcoms, gay athletes, gay "rights" (an intellectual absurdity), gay marriage.
A significant segment of America's homosexual population wants to demand acceptance from the majority while simultaneously acting in a way that is unacceptable - a way they know is unacceptable.
It's antagonistic.
Mark my words, eventually people are going to push back.
Sounds like a threat. Guess what, though? You're wrong. The majority of American's don't care. Believe it or not, gay people aren't antagonizing you by existing, and only the most hateful of bigots think otherwise.
Honestly, the more that you put your intense hatred of homosexuality out there, the more that I think you're projecting. You wouldn't hate gay people so much if they didn't tempt you just a little bit. Frankly, you strike me as pretty gay and *really* deep in the closet about it.
Maybe it'll take an economic calamity, maybe it'll take whatever, but it is going to happen, and when the pendulum swings, the "we're like slaves" crowd amid the homosexual community will probably look back and think 1995 America wasn't as horribly oppressive as their political performances made it out to be.
One of the main ingredients to the fall of the Weimar Republic was a small minority enforcing immorality and decadence on a majority that utterly rejected it. This included pornography, decadent forms of art and entertainment, adultery, and homosexuality. A political party inevitably took center stage and shouted to the people that they would put an end to it.
You keep maintaining that you represent a moral majority, and I've already given extensive statistics that prove that you're wrong. There's nothing mor eto say on the matter.
I like women, but I don't have sex with them in the streets to make a spectacle out of myself. I find it amusing that BradyFTW liked your post, seems to understand your post, and at the same time doesn't seem to think homosexuals should regulate or restrain their behavior in any way.
Straw man. Please give one example where I said that. And yes, I did understand Joker's post. Clearly you didn't, which is why I'd love to hear your take on how this supports your position:
It's all relative. The fact remains that homosexuality is as much a facet of human existence as blond hair or black hair, blue eyes or brown. It is my opinion that our country is saturated with NIMBY syndrome and this leads to these virulent conflicts over something that essentially is not going to change, nor should it, as long as there are human beings on this planet.
The fact that you think pride parades are representative of the gay population at large just further proves that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Let's give it twenty years and see how that works out for them in the end.
Sure, let's. In 20 years it will be even more evident that you're a sad, hateful little man whose morality has been long ago left behind by the country at large.
