Jeeessss, why do you do this to yourself. The answer to that question always is it depends DEPENDS. It depends when the market is highest. In some cases the markets is highest prior to the draft. In the Pats case, if they had been offered a good #1 they probably would have traded him. But they WEREN'T.
Based on the ACTUAL Market JG was of more value to the Pats going into the season as their back up, than what the market bore right after the draft. Clearly the market was better at the trade deadline, when SF didn't have much at QB. What don't you get about that. You heard a RUMOR that the Pats MIGHT be offered a #1 for JG and have never let up on it, regardless of the lack of any substantive evidence that anyone actually DID!
Because they were DESPERATE for OLmen in 2020, or don't you remember and evidently it was worth the extra year of Thuney than trade him in 2002 and not get the comp. As good as he was are you saying someone was going to give the Pats a first AND pay him top dollar? In what home team fantasy where you dreaming up that one.
NO! it was absolutely defendable if you knew BOB was coming in 2023, even understandable. You were never going to attract a quality OC and staff for a one year gig. Unless you knew in advance how it WOULD work out, not how MIGHT it work out. I DID make some sense. But what WASN'T defendable were the results. I doubt no one expected it to be THAT bad, though I'm sure in your brilliance you knew long before.
It's not that Bill hasn't made bad decisions in the past. And feel free to point them out. He's made hundreds of them, out of the tens of thousands he's had to make every season. But please take the time to acknowledge how many good one that have benefited this franchise over the last 23 years. But I guess doing that would spoil you buzz