The other thread got shutdown so moving the discussion here...
You are delusional, my friend.
Those MVP votes accomplished exactly what they set out to accomplish. They weren't real votes. If I dressed up for an NFL team, I could get MVP votes for the exact same reasons that Carson Wentz did. Me. I could get MVP votes. That should tell you all you need to know.
I will give you another example - the entire sport of boxing. If I told you that I could enter the boxing ring and beat Canelo, that would seem preposterous to you at first, because you've been conditioned to believe that only "traditional" boxers can have success in this particular form of entertainment. However, once you break it down and really get into the nitty gritty of it, it won't seem outrageous at all.
You need to be able to discern between real and fake accomplishments in sports.
You must be the world's greatest athlete... NFL quarterback and pound for pound the best boxer on the planet.
You just completely demolished your own argument here.
You refuse to give Bill Belichick credit for something he did under another head coach, where his impact was only on one side of the football, yet you want to give all the credit for the 6 SBs won by the Patriots to a player, whose impact was also on only one side of the football.
You can't have it both ways. I am fine with disregarding Belichick's 2 rings as a DC and only focusing on his rings as a head coach and GM, where his impact was felt throughout the entire team, so long as you also disregard player rings. After all, coordinator rings and player rings are equivalent. But if you want to include them all, then everyone with fewer than 8 rings is a peasant who must bow down and kiss Bill's rings.
I'm not following your convoluted criteria for legitimizing rings. Either you're the head coach or you're an assistant of some sort. Belichick was an assistant of Parcells. When you consider 'coach and quarterback' accomplishment, you don't think defensive coordinator and quarterback, obviously. It's a head coach and starting quarterback record.
Regarding importance to an entire team, the starting quarterback is significantly more important than any assistant coach. Belichick has 2 rings as an assistant to Parcells. Belichick has 6 rings as a head coach with Brady as his quarterback. Brady has 7 rings with two different head coaches.
That's not film. Those are stats. If you want to use stats, you have to adjust them to account for the presence of the GOAT coach.
Your foolishness is hard to follow. Stats, film, by whatever measure or observation, Brady is easily the most talented, most accomplished, the best, however you choose to phrase it, quarterback in the history of the Patriots franchise.
This is what you're saying... from your film study of every Patriots quarterback ever, Brady ranks 5th. A claim like that is death for your credibility.
I never said any QB needs Belichick to win a SB. Plenty of QBs have won a ring without Belichick. Guys like Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Mark Rypien, etc. All solid dependable QBs. You can be a solid and dependable QB and still win a ring without Belichick. But no QB in the history of the sport has won 6 of them with a single team without Bill Belichick, and likely never will.
You did... you said Belichick was Brady's "crutch." No other quarterback in the history of the league has more than 4 rings period. Your tie in with Belichick is meaningless because the quarterback who has 6 with him has won 7.