- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,875
- Reaction score
- 29,559
Saying Brady benefited from FA instead of keeping a superbowl team every year is just flat out stupid, especially considering Belichick didnt go after free agents like most other coaches.
I didn't say that they went after FAs every year. However, Brady doesn't win multiple rings without Vrabel, Harrison, Revis, Ninkovich, Antoine Smith, or Gilmore. That is a fact.
Did you say Ty Law didnt emerge until BB took over? LMAO
That's when he played his best football. Without Bill, Ty Law is not in the HOF.
Bill has 8 rings....The same way JG has 2 rings Bill has 6 as a head coach....all with Brady. Brady has 7 rings as a starting QB. Brady left and still won, Bill has not. As a head coach without Brady Bill has a losing record, and is 17-15 the last two years.
And Brady hasn't won a super bowl without either Bill or Gronk...your point?
Ah yes the Cassel Argument....well if having a winning record with Cassel makes you the goat coach, than whoever the coach of the chiefs was when Cassel went 10-6 must also be in that conversation. Funny thing is though, with Brady that team was 16-0, usually losing 5 more games the next year is a drop off for a team. So Bill took a super team to 11 wins with Cassel, the coach of the chiefs took a mediocre team to 10 wins with Cassel....
Cassell never started a game in college or the NFL until 2008. Whatever he learned from BB he took to KC.
Last edited:











