- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 48,097
- Reaction score
- 29,602
So the Pats inquired about OJ Howard from the Bucs...did they inquire about Cameron Brate too who sees like the Y TE we need??
Brate just signed a 5 year extension. Why would Tampa trade him?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So the Pats inquired about OJ Howard from the Bucs...did they inquire about Cameron Brate too who sees like the Y TE we need??
Lucky guy. Goes from a 1-6 team to a guaranteed ring.
I think the purpose of limiting how many guys you can bring back from the IR is because they are afraid teams will be constantly stashing guys on the IR instead of releasing them. So I don't think they will be changing the rule anytime soon. The best you could hope for might be increasing the number from 2 to 3.Agreed. But that's not how it's written currently. Hopefully, they league will change it.. They've already changed the rule once. It used to be you had to use the designation when you put the player on the IR. Now, you can wait..
Not sure if we still are talking about the Sanu trade, but if we still are, I have a few brief comments.
1. I don't like the fact that we traded for a WR in the first place. I like it less that if we WERE going to trade for a WR he wasn't a "field stretcher" speed guy. I like it even LESS that if we were going to to trade for a WR we'd do it for a 2nd round pick.
2. Now that I got that out of the way, let me tell you how I REALLY feel. I worry that the fact that Bill felt the need to make this trade for this price, says more about where he feels Gordon and Harry are in their return to the team than the immediate need for a WR.
3. Sanu has been a quality professional his entire career. I'm guessing a pick in the early 60's was the price that it took to get him. Ideally one of the 3rd round comp picks would have done it, but the market IS the market.
4. I would have rather gotten someone like Howard, though I'm cooling on Brate because I'm thinking that's the same as a healthy Lacosse. Howard was the prize for me. I don't understand why TB is so adamant in not trading him. Arians doesn't value TE's, the team isn't going anywhere, and there is a Patriot connection to the FO.
5. In the end we are a better offensive team for having him. But by how much better remains to be seen.
I think the purpose of limiting how many guys you can bring back from the IR is because they are afraid teams will be constantly stashing guys on the IR instead of releasing them. So I don't think they will be changing the rule anytime soon. The best you could hope for might be increasing the number from 2 to 3.
Not sure if we still are talking about the Sanu trade, but if we still are, I have a few brief comments.
1. I don't like the fact that we traded for a WR in the first place. I like it less that if we WERE going to trade for a WR he wasn't a "field stretcher" speed guy. I like it even LESS that if we were going to to trade for a WR we'd do it for a 2nd round pick.
2. Now that I got that out of the way, let me tell you how I REALLY feel. I worry that the fact that Bill felt the need to make this trade for this price, says more about where he feels Gordon and Harry are in their return to the team than the immediate need for a WR.
3. Sanu has been a quality professional his entire career. I'm guessing a pick in the early 60's was the price that it took to get him. Ideally one of the 3rd round comp picks would have done it, but the market IS the market.
4. I would have rather gotten someone like Howard, though I'm cooling on Brate because I'm thinking that's the same as a healthy Lacosse. Howard was the prize for me. I don't understand why TB is so adamant in not trading him. Arians doesn't value TE's, the team isn't going anywhere, and there is a Patriot connection to the FO.
5. In the end we are a better offensive team for having him. But by how much better remains to be seen.
Hes a solid player who should fit in this offense. Gordon is out until after the bye most likely and Harry wont have to be thrown to the fire now.
Now bill doesnt have to worry about putting gunner out there as a #4 receiver or beating edelman into the ground
This I believe is he exact reason we traded for him. We needed depth and players since Gordon is hurt and Harry still on IR. Plus, it's insurance for Gordon next year. I'm totally fine with it. Sanu is a solid player.
Now if we can only dump Bennett and get a new TE...
You still have to be under the cap though and guys can work out an IR release if they want to be a free agent. I don’t really see the downside.I think the purpose of limiting how many guys you can bring back from the IR is because they are afraid teams will be constantly stashing guys on the IR instead of releasing them. So I don't think they will be changing the rule anytime soon. The best you could hope for might be increasing the number from 2 to 3.
This I believe is he exact reason we traded for him. We needed depth and players since Gordon is hurt and Harry still on IR. Plus, it's insurance for Gordon next year. I'm totally fine with it. Sanu is a solid player.
Now if we can only dump Bennett and get a new TE...
Or traded along with a third for Howard or Hooper.This Defense with a not yet familiar Michael Bennett is making QB's cringe just imagine when Bennett get up to speed Hmmmmm.
Ken, we needed to bring in a quality WR. The group we have is just not good enough. Even with Gordon it did not look good enough. Brady knows it, Belichick knows it. That’s why he brought in such a controversial player in AB and why he sent a second rounder for Sanu. It tells you that they are not confident in what they have and I’d defer to what they think they need.Not sure if we still are talking about the Sanu trade, but if we still are, I have a few brief comments.
1. I don't like the fact that we traded for a WR in the first place. I like it less that if we WERE going to trade for a WR he wasn't a "field stretcher" speed guy. I like it even LESS that if we were going to to trade for a WR we'd do it for a 2nd round pick.
2. Now that I got that out of the way, let me tell you how I REALLY feel. I worry that the fact that Bill felt the need to make this trade for this price, says more about where he feels Gordon and Harry are in their return to the team than the immediate need for a WR.
3. Sanu has been a quality professional his entire career. I'm guessing a pick in the early 60's was the price that it took to get him. Ideally one of the 3rd round comp picks would have done it, but the market IS the market.
4. I would have rather gotten someone like Howard, though I'm cooling on Brate because I'm thinking that's the same as a healthy Lacosse. Howard was the prize for me. I don't understand why TB is so adamant in not trading him. Arians doesn't value TE's, the team isn't going anywhere, and there is a Patriot connection to the FO.
5. In the end we are a better offensive team for having him. But by how much better remains to be seen.
Or traded along with a third for Howard or Hooper.
I know I knowHooper is the Falcons future at TE I am sure BB inquired.
Hooper is the Falcons future at TE I am sure BB inquired.
| 20 | 2K |
| 9 | 3K |
| 13 | 815 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











