If we put him behind our line last year, how much would he have put performed Michel though. In the passing game probably by a lot. In the run game, probably not by a lot but who really knows (on a per carry basis
what if Michel was on the giants last year. Probably gets no where close to saquons production which is interesting.
I mean Barkley is the superior player so we know he'll perform better w less around him but again I'm looking a lot deeper then that.
You don't
need a peak LT, Peterson or Payton to win games or championships. We've seen this first-hand w guys like Smith, BJGE, Blount, Dillon, Woodhead, Vereen, White, Sony ... The Shanahans are famous for winning w just abt any RB. Look at how SF is doing w Breida, Coleman & Mostert.
It's just a position/production you can find anywhere. Sure who wouldn't want Barkley on their team but at what price? The #2 overall pick? Absolutely no way. That's insanity imo.
Chubb: 445/2277 - 5.2/5.1 per - 15 TD - 3 fmb - Rec - 72 targets/52 rec - 405 yards - 7.5/8.0 per - 69/74.4% catch rate -
Barkley: 415/1917 - 5.0/4.0% - 13 TD - 1 fmb - Rec - 132/1017 - 7.9/7.1 per - 75.2/68.3% catch rate
Barkley was the #2 overall pick & already a top 5-8 cap hit.
Chubb was the 35th pick making a little more than 800K.
While I didn't
hate the Sony pick he wouldn't have been my choice while Jackson, Landry (I had both graded a lot higher) & others were available.
Side Note 2018 definitely had some beast.
Rd1: Alexander, Nelson, Jackson, Vea, Chubb, Smith, Davenport, Miller, Minkah, Edmunds, James, LVE,
Rd2 Leonard, Sutton, Kirk, Goedert, Chark
Definitely others I'm missing but that looks pretty good so far.