fightingirish595
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 8,711
- Reaction score
- 5,433
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So it’s about me but at the same time my post which has nothing to do with race reminds you of a post I have nothing to do with. Got it.
It's more then obvious you never watched him college & never demonstrated, broke down anything concerning the Pats offense.Hope you’ll read my previous post first because it boils down to the same thing. Did the actual, real-life (not theoretical) Louisville EP offense - with Jackson - even resemble the Patriots or any pro offense (no, since his running abilities completely changed many of the concepts and made it much easier to execute.). Do Jackson’s current reads, passes, and difficulty level against defenses resemble what other NFL QBs face (no.). He could have run and understood the most complicated system in the universe. He has yet to prove he can actually execute an offense effectively without the massive advantage that his running threat imposes on defenses. Teams don’t defend the Ravens the same way they’d defend most teams. Teams didn’t defend Louisville like they would the Patriots EP system. Because the Jackson forces matchups that afford much easier passes. Again, good for him. Again, this does not prove he would thrive in the NFL if speed and running abilities decline. It’s so obvious watching him I’m surprised you can’t just acknowledge it’s still an unknown.
Damm you came strapped this morning. Took off from the free throw line.LMAO, no one in the forum gaf if you are great at being an NFL draft geek. Your attitude towards the forum and their posters is what makes you annoying. Not many posters spend 20+ hours a week watching college football like you do. Maybe you're in the wrong forum?
At least we now know that you're an insecure football nerd with a small d i c k, BaconBit. LMFAO
Thread is cancer
It's more then obvious you never watched him college & never demonstrated, broke down anything concerning the Pats offense.
The idea that he couldn't run any system bc he's a dynamic threat who can run sounds like I'm talking to someone from kindergarten.
Honestly you'd be laughed out a room of players & coaches w all due respect.
Jackson and Mahomes aren't locks for the HOF quite yet.
Only BaconGrundleCandy is a lock for the Hall of Fame. He’s been in the war rooms, the board rooms, etc.
BB may need to go back to how the Falcons were defended during the “DVD” era. The two offenses carry some striking similarities.I'll let the men talk but fact is BAL is a run-first team and use the run to set up the pass. Not vice versa.
347 passing plays
478 running plays
IMO it's irrelevant LJ is a "run first" or "pass first" QB. Hes a great running/rushing QB. That is a major strength of this offense and they are taking advantage of it. Hes also a competent passing QB. Hes no Brady but hes an above-average passer.
If I'm comparing him to college QBs hes a helluva lot closer to VT Mike Vick or Balyor RG3 than the Barry Switzer 80s OU teams or Tommie Frazier from the mid 90s Nebraska teams.
One thing that I've noticed in the few times that I've seen Jackson play is that he seems to be much more accurate with passes over the middle than he is with passes outside the numbers.
Yea definitely something you want him doing. Not a big strength rn & been noted since college. Definitely want to clog the middle/seam.
His track record is pretty good with evaluating players. this is undeniable
Over your head.
You mentioned how he was fast & his rushing yards. People see that & chalk him up to "another running QB". And like I said the fact that he can do all those other things doesn't make him a run first QB. It just means he can do **** no one else can.
I wasn't saying you believed that. Again a ton see what he can do in the open field & make an ignorant judgement.
I would not state that Lamar is a "run first QB" however he does run quite a bit more than most QB's.
Good. You finally got it.
But he thinks he’s proven that Jackson is not a big injury risk now (in a thread about Jackson’s quad injury).
This is a discussion and not a debate board. I just brought up a glaring difference between the QB’s you listed and Jackson.Okay, so if we're gonna keep shifting the goal posts til we get the argument we like, there's no QB who's carried it as much as Jackson, ergo we can't make any conclusions about durability (other than to note Jackson himself has yet to endure any meaningful injury).
You mentioned him being fast, rushing for all those yards.SIMPLY WRONG!!!
here is exactly what I said @ post #97:
What the Hell is "over my head"??
What I posted is pretty clear.
You are better than this.
It's painful but my fault for even bothering w most.Forum is cancer
I'm not rooting for him to get injured ... If Lamar gets injured between now and the AFCCG, and it helps our cause, I'm all for it. Again, not rooting for the player to get injured ...
BB may need to go back to how the Falcons were defended during the “DVD” era. The two offenses carry some striking similarities.
Not hindsight if you're talking about it long before the draft. I wanted Jackson here long before anyone in the media or most fans even heard his name.
You mentioned him being fast, rushing for all those yards.
I honestly wasn't referring to you, I was saying people see how good of a runner he & assume he just takes off at the drop of a dime.