- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,355
- Reaction score
- 105,348
I sure would.IF we'd had Drafted him and he had similar success you wouldn't be saying that Lamar Jackson have had our number.
Your definition of success is different than mine.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I sure would.IF we'd had Drafted him and he had similar success you wouldn't be saying that Lamar Jackson have had our number.
...who are both better than Jackson.They are many overrated QB's is this League ie... D Prescott - J Herbert among others of course we would love to have their problem.
Guess they need to take that MVP he won a few years back.I sure would.
Your definition of success is different than mine.
It may be a case of the player forcing his way out of town. Jackson probably realizes he's got too much on his plate in Baltimore. They just haven't sustained any talent around him on Offense. Andrews is a nice TE but their offense is heavily Lamar centric, to a point where he won't be able to hold up physically. He pretty much did a hold out at the end of this past season because he didn't want to risk (further) injury. And he's not offering Baltimore even a penny's worth of a hometown discount. They're widely apart in contract negotiations so Baltimore's best option (which isn't that good) may be to tag and trade. I like Lamar so it's the outcome I want to see, him with a fresh start in a better spot.Right, but doesn't that strike you as odd that the Ravens would be moving on? They don't normally make terrible personnel moves.
Seeing how he sucked in the playoffs for a 14-2 team they sure should.Guess they need to take that MVP he won a few years back.
So he's had elite WRs elite TEs and still a middling QB..Sign the beast trade Mac.
Since he's been in the league had elite weapons and still a middling QB..I thought they were low-key about it.
It was Carr who excused himself from the team and drew attention to his situation.
Yeah, but I do think it's interesting that the Ravens don't see him (in terms of contract) as a top QB. I wonder what other teams think. I also wonder what the Ravens do next, because their other QBs aren't very good.It may be a case of the player forcing his way out of town. Jackson probably realizes he's got too much on his plate in Baltimore. They just haven't sustained any talent around him on Offense. Andrews is a nice TE but their offense is heavily Lamar centric, to a point where he won't be able to hold up physically. He pretty much did a hold out at the end of this past season because he didn't want to risk (further) injury. And he's not offering Baltimore even a penny's worth of a hometown discount. They're widely apart in contract negotiations so Baltimore's best option (which isn't that good) may be to tag and trade. I like Lamar so it's the outcome I want to see, him with a fresh start in a better spot.
Yep. Carr has had very good weapons. He's a slightly above average QB. Maybe.So he's had elite WRs elite TEs and still a middling QB..
Since he's been in the league had elite weapons and still a middling QB..
Herbert is probably heading toward a HOF career. But I'm definitely taking Lamar over Dak. Let's say they flip teams... Cowboys become the NFC favorite for sure and the Ravens with Dak might be looking at 4th in their division....who are both better than Jackson.
Ravens currently have $30 mil in cap space with no quarterback on the books. Not ideal considering Jackson won't budge from top tier $. Raiders have $50 mil in cap space and they can provide Jackson with a much better supporting cast.Yeah, but I do think it's interesting that the Ravens don't see him (in terms of contract) as a top QB. I wonder what other teams think. I also wonder what the Ravens do next, because their other QBs aren't very good.
Herbert is probably heading toward a HOF career. But I'm definitely taking Lamar over Dak. Let's say they flip teams... Cowboys become the NFC favorite for sure and the Ravens with Dak might be looking at 4th in their division.
Right, but I'm looking at it from the team perspective. If Jackson is your QB and the other QBs on the roster aren't good and you have $30 million in cap, you sign him to a deal and spread out the hit. But that they don't want to suggests that they think he's not their QB of the future. It's that decision I find interesting.Ravens currently have $30 mil in cap space with no quarterback on the books. Not ideal considering Jackson won't budge from top tier $. Raiders have $50 mil in cap space and they can provide Jackson with a much better supporting cast.
Herbert is 24 years old. He's only been a starter in the NFL for 3 seasons. He's got plenty of time (to continue) to prove himself and he's setting an early pace to contend for several career passing records.Herbert needs to prove he can win in the playoffs and in big situations before he will ever have a chance to be considered for the HOF. Right now he is Philip Rivers 2.0. All the stats without the big time wins especially in the playoffs. It may not be all on him, but until he does win, he will get a good portion of the blame.
Dak is a better passer. Doubtful Cowboys improveHerbert is probably heading toward a HOF career. But I'm definitely taking Lamar over Dak. Let's say they flip teams... Cowboys become the NFC favorite for sure and the Ravens with Dak might be looking at 4th in their division.
Me, too! Yet, somehow felt appropriate considering the subject matter...I HATE THAT AD!
I put it on the curse of the ChargersHerbert is 24 years old. He's only been a starter in the NFL for 3 seasons. He's got plenty of time (to continue) to prove himself and he's setting an early pace to contend for several career passing records.
I'm putting the playoff loss on his idiot head coach.
Baltimore offered Jackson a 5-year extension worth $250m, with $133m guaranteed at signing, that would have run through the 2027 season. He turned it down because he wants a fully guaranteed contract similar to what Watson got from Cleveland. That's where the $100 difference comes in (regarding guaranteed $). If Baltimore decides Jackson isn't worth a fully guaranteed contract then they'll tag and trade at this point. And then look forward to a 5-12 season.Right, but I'm looking at it from the team perspective. If Jackson is your QB and the other QBs on the roster aren't good and you have $30 million in cap, you sign him to a deal and spread out the hit. But that they don't want to suggests that they think he's not their QB of the future. It's that decision I find interesting.
I have more faith in him in big situations than I do most of the young QBs.Herbert needs to prove he can win in the playoffs and in big situations before he will ever have a chance to be considered for the HOF. Right now he is Philip Rivers 2.0. All the stats without the big time wins especially in the playoffs. It may not be all on him, but until he does win, he will get a good portion of the blame.
So you think another team will decide he's worth it? Who do you think makes the trade for him? Las Vegas? Maybe the Jets?Baltimore offered Jackson a 5-year extension worth $250m, with $133m guaranteed at signing, that would have run through the 2027 season. He turned it down because he wants a fully guaranteed contract similar to what Watson got from Cleveland. That's where the $100 difference comes in (regarding guaranteed $). If Baltimore decides Jackson isn't worth a fully guaranteed contract then they'll tag and trade at this point. And then look forward to a 5-12 season.