- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,383
- Reaction score
- 23,470
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Pretty big statement with 7 games remaining. You must see them going 3-4 or 4-3 the rest of the way?If Bolden is our lead back on Sun, we're in trouble. He can't run between the tackles (except for draws when in passing situations).
They will have to unleash JJ - and risk pass protection for the spark he could be. If we don't have a run threat, their D will overpower our O.
This game means a ton for our season. AFC seeding, TNF game following, still have Titans, Colts, Bills x2.
If we lose - no playoffs. If we win - good shot of playoffs.
I get your point but he might be right. The Browns are the type of team they need to beat, a team in the playoff hunt. If they lose to the Browns, they will have only beaten the Jets in six home games.Pretty big statement with 7 games remaining. You must see them going 3-4 or 4-3 the rest of the way?
Sure but they will have 7 games left. Plenty of time.I get your point but he might be right. The Browns are the type of team they need to beat, a team in the playoff hunt. If they lose to the Browns, they will have only beaten the Jets in five home games.
So what is the game plan if the big RBs can’t go? Lean on a sporadic passing game? Agholor and Smith offer little. So Meyers, Bourne and Henry? Some passes to Taylor? Never know what can happen, but seems pretty easy to defend.
We will need to be able to run. Cle is not a juggernaut on defense, but they are top 5 in sacks, that has not spelled good for the pats. I could say the same for the browns too though.So what is the game plan if the big RBs can’t go? Lean on a sporadic passing game? Agholor and Smith offer little. So Meyers, Bourne and Henry? Some passes to Taylor? Never know what can happen, but seems pretty easy to defend.
Our O-tackles playing well in the run game:
Interesting dilemma for us when he comes back...I doubt we activate him this week, but when he's back, where does he go and who is our starting 5? Do we bench Wynn, move him to LG or keep him at LT? Interesting choices for the coaching staff. Onwenu is a pro bowler, I don't care where he plays, but he has sure stabilized the right side of our line at RT.Wynn has allowed a team leading 18 QB pressures. It's almost as if LG might be a good fit for him.....
.
Interesting dilemma for us when he comes back...I doubt we activate him this week, but when he's back, where does he go and who is our starting 5? Do we bench Wynn, move him to LG or keep him at LT? Interesting choices for the coaching staff. Onwenu is a pro bowler, I don't care where he plays, but he has sure stabilized the right side of our line at RT.
Wynn has played a lot better these last 3 or so weeks but is still scary. Owenu needs to stay at RT.Interesting dilemma for us when he comes back...I doubt we activate him this week, but when he's back, where does he go and who is our starting 5? Do we bench Wynn, move him to LG or keep him at LT? Interesting choices for the coaching staff. Onwenu is a pro bowler, I don't care where he plays, but he has sure stabilized the right side of our line at RT.
Our O-tackles playing well in the run game:
Brown can play either tackle position. Onwenu can play RT or LG. Wynn so far is just a LT though long term he could be a G. Assuming we want all 3 to be starting, those limitations suggest Wynn at LT, Brown at RT, and Onwenu at LG.Wynn has played a lot better these last 3 or so weeks but is still scary. Owenu needs to stay at RT.
I think it's too late in the season to start experimenting with Wynn at LG. TC was the time to do it.
| 22 | 2K |
| 100 | 4K |
| 11 | 1K |
| 20 | 561 |
| 5 | 792 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 27 - May 12 (Through 26yrs)











