Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I will agree with you that Cooks was obviously our best WR, especially when Amendola went down, but Brady was chucking a lot of balls up there out of desperation, too, so I can't really get behind the idea that Cooks necessarily looked great.There were a few plays where Cooks beat his man with a double move, but brady was keyed in on Gronk or Amendola and simply didn't look cooks way
Cook caught a 54 yard throw, he had 88 yards receiving..had 2 DPIs including a key one in third quarter in the end zone that set up go ahead TD
I thought it was one of each, but I'm not the best when it comes to remembering stressful situations. My mind starts to get distracted and I can't pay attention as closely as I normally do. What I need is a good old fashioned drinking habit, at least as it pertains to the games.I thought it was one DPI and 2 defensive holding calls.
I will agree with you that Cooks was obviously our best WR, especially when Amendola went down, but Brady was chucking a lot of balls up there out of desperation, too, so I can't really get behind the idea that Cooks necessarily looked great.
He made a nice grab on the long ball and showed his speed on the 15 yd crossing route. He's certainly got the ability to draw coverage. Let's just hope Tom doesn't start forcing it like he did Moss, because there aren't a lot of viable WR options at the moment. Losing Edelman, Mitchell, and Amendola have certainly changed things quite a bit.
While he's a great weapon with lots of potential, I think a lot of people just assumed that Cooks would immediately step in and have a flawless rapport with Brady. I don't think we'll see that for awhile.
I think we should settle down on this kind of talk. Cooks and Brady have lots of work to do in order to get into the kind of rhythm that we're used to seeing. As I've said, part of Cooks' strength is wasted due to the loss of a viable slot receiver.
Cooks appeared to be double covered with safety help, so I'm not sure that he was always open last night, as you're suggesting. Pretty sure Tom, Josh, or Bill would've picked up on that. Also, exactly how many of these "quite a few DPI flags" did Cooks draw? Just curious.
The QB3 trade to the Colts will start paying dividends next week. In the meantime, BB needs to figure out who can win in the slot/quick route areas, and he may have to look to RB for that answer.
I can't wait to watch the all 22 to see the game from a different angle.
But I think, and I'm just throwing this out there, they need to force defensive coverage away from either Hogan or Cooks instead of the other way around. If they were putting their #1 CB on Hogan and double covering Cooks they have to find a guy that can beat a #3 CB. Maybe they'll get more work from Burkhead or Lewis in that area.
Anyways just open thoughts. Once gamepass is open I'll post some screenshots to further the discussion.
The Defense is a whole other animal. I don't even know where to start with that.
I'm sure DW Toys will have a lengthy list for us in the morning.Gotta be some smart, good slot, guy on some team somewhere that is being underutilized.
Problem is people here were already saying use a RB in the slot once Edelman went down. You'd think that would have been a point of emphasis or they flat out don't have one that can work that way. Gotta be some smart, good slot, guy on some team somewhere that is being underutilized.
I think this team might have had too much smoke blown up its ass the past seventh months.
What they did last year was legendary and people are still talking about it. I've been watching a lot of NFL Network the past few days and reading other football websites and this team has been hyped more than any other Patriots team I can remember.
I wonder how much of that gets through to the players. Belichick usually keeps them humble but they still might be reading their own headlines. Also some of the new guys had some problems today, maybe they all thought they could just step in to the system and suddenly be Patriot-level. Hopefully they learned that's not the case. As BB said in the pregame clip where he visited his old high school, you have to earn it.
This team has to earn it all over again. 2016 is over and they just learned that the hard way. Hopefully they are quick learners.
The only time Peters was more than 1 yard separated from Hogan was when Hogan was in the huddle.
They played passive and when they didn't, they made plays. Giving up newely 10 yards per play is ridiculous. It's almost like they feared the KC speed and while normally the bend but don't break works, they broke tonight.
Also, I didn't like seeing DMac in coverage on Kelce or the TE's. I don't know why Chung wasn't stapled to Kelce all night long. I wonder if those long plays may have been prevented if DMac was playing high safety.
Tom Brady is the greatest quarterback in human history... but Father Time always wins.
I think that is going to be quite the challenge in such a short period of time, but I certainly hope that you're correct. Perhaps he can help dictate coverage and open up certain areas for others.The QB3 trade to the Colts will start paying dividends next week.
Jeez, you must really like pain to be going on opposing team's messageboards, let alone a divisional rival.Just saw this posted on a Dolphins forum: "Ahh. The Patriots will never know what 17-0 feels like".
I like reading them because often time its laughable reading their posts. I know I sound bias, but damn a lot of what they say sounds so uneducated.Jeez, you must really like pain to be going on opposing team's messageboards, let alone a divisional rival.
I'm not a fan of the whole opening night atmosphere, and I doubt Belichick is, either. He grumbled about how the "circus would be in town" for the 2003 or 2004 opener and didn't seem too happy about it. At least we didn't look like fools wearing red clown noses. That would've sucked ass.Yea, while it's obviously not the reason for the loss, I thought all the pre-game highlights of SB 51 were so unnecessary, not to mention showing the 28-3 score throughout the stadium.
I'm also not a fan of having them wear those Super Bowl LI Champions patches when a bunch of the guys out there weren't even on that team.
| 1K | 35K |
| 79 | 3K |
| 4 | 607 |
| 83 | 3K |
| 6 | 573 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











