patsfaninpittsburgh
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,054
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.upstater
You are missing the point. The Chargers won the division. We did lose to them. You can't say someone the Pats lost to have a less legit playoff claim because they won the division with an inferior record.
upstater
You are missing the point. The Chargers won the division. We did lose to them. You can't say someone the Pats lost to have a less legit playoff claim because they won the division with an inferior record.
Bottom line, we're not going to have Belichick forever, and there is NO guarantee of future success in this league. When you miss out on an opportunity to play in the playoffs, it's one more year ticked away on this great era we've seen. I will never think that is a good thing, even if we legitimately did not deserve to go.
Once again, other than linebacks, do we actually have an aging defense? D-Line is young and good and 2ndary is young and getting there. I guess Rosie, Junior, Bru, and Vrabs somehow make everyone else collectively old?
Thank you. This is one of the biggest myths in sports. I don't think the OP was necessarily suggesting it, but it surprises me that even some Patriots fans buy into the "old" meme.
the pats are 1-4 against the AFC playoff teams..........so their omission from the playoffs is not much of a travesty.......the chargers had to play the NFC south while the pats had to play the NFC west.......the first place NFC west team would have been tied for last in the NFC south.......
it would have been nice to have the pats in the playoffs, but they collectively earned their spot on the couch........
that said, the pats are on a 3 year cycle.....2002,2005,2008 have been down years........every other year since 2001, they have at least made it to the AFC championship
they keep us more than entertained...........and it is always interesting to watch the changes after a down year
there is no blessing in disguise in not making the playoffs. nice tryWell of course making the playoffs would be exciting, BUT... over the past 5 years or so, the Patriots have had to play 2 additional months of football than most of the NFL.
And although it stinks to not be in the playoffs with an 11-5 record, which one year gave us the bye, it also means that we have a HIGHLY successfull football team by NFL standards that gets an additional 2 months to rest and regroup for next season.
And let's face it, when Brady went down, no one event expected to be in this position, when brady went down we expected to be out of the playoffs...
Now all our aging Defense gets another 2 months of rest, our coaches, and all those connected to the team gets a little extra rest they very well deserve.
Which hopefully translates into a powerful rested team come 2009 season.
I know the NFC West sucked, but you also have to account for the fact that the AFC West sucked too. The Patriots got to play the Raiders, Chiefs and Broncos 3 times. The Chargers got to play those teams 6 times. Big difference there, and it makes up for the difference between the NFC West and NFC South.
Well of course making the playoffs would be exciting, BUT... over the past 5 years or so, the Patriots have had to play 2 additional months of football than most of the NFL.
And although it stinks to not be in the playoffs with an 11-5 record, which one year gave us the bye, it also means that we have a HIGHLY successfull football team by NFL standards that gets an additional 2 months to rest and regroup for next season.
And let's face it, when Brady went down, no one event expected to be in this position, when brady went down we expected to be out of the playoffs...
Now all our aging Defense gets another 2 months of rest, our coaches, and all those connected to the team gets a little extra rest they very well deserve.
Which hopefully translates into a powerful rested team come 2009 season.
The only reason I really wanted to make the playoffs after I saw it was possible is because I feel it would have forced people who hate BB to acknowledge what an amazing coach he is. I mean our entire team could get eaten by a giant lizard at the start of the season and this guy would still get us to .500 with practice squad guys and free agents.
except that the chargers absolutely annihilated the pats........
if the situation was reversed, you'd be glad
What? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Just doesn't make sense. If the Patriots had beaten the Chargers, I'd be happier? Uh, YEAH!
But you're the one arguing the Chargers had a tougher schedule. They didn't. Their AFC West schedule made up for the fact the Patriots had an easier NFC schedule, and the Patriots still ended up 3 wins better on the season.
Head to head wins are meaningless when you are 3 wins apart in the standings, as I'm sure the Titans would say the same thing to the Jets. Arizona would say th same thing to the Patriots: your win against us is meaningless.
no......you'd have no problem with the pats going to the playoffs at 8-8 while the chargers stayed home at 11-5........
the chargers had to play the AFC west for 6 games and the NFC south for 4 games..........6 'easy' games ..... the pats had to play the AFC west for 4 games and the NFC west for 4 games .... 8 'easy' games.......
you're just complaining because the setup in its current state worked against your team ....... like I said, I wouldn't be saying 'boo' if the jets had won and there were 2 10 win teams sitting at home while an 8 win team went......admit as much
Of course I wouldn't mind, but I still wouldn't think it was right. Just like I don't mind that the Red Sox benefit from being an upper echelon financial team, but I still want to see MLB institute a salary cap that will help the lower teams.
I'm not going to stop rooting for a team because they took advantage of a rule, but that doesn't mean I like the rule or am forced to like that rule because my team benefitted from it.